<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with re-population</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/re-population</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 're-population' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:48:17 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:48:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Oops! I destroyed the world...again.</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/50835/Oops%2DI%2Ddestroyed%2Dthe%2Dworldagain</link>	
	<description>So...let&apos;s say that some freak nuclear accident (or, in our current political climate, perhaps a purposeful nuclear attack) wipes out most of the world&apos;s population.  How many people would have to survive to successfully re-populate the world? (more inside) Taking into account the fact that, at some point, inter-breeding would probably become a problem...how would this be avoided?  How can the world be re-populated with a limited stock?  Is this eventually not a problem?  How does genetics play into this?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.50835</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:48:17 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>extinction</category>
	<category>genetics</category>
	<category>re-population</category>
	<dc:creator>AlliKat75</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

