<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with polymath</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/polymath</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'polymath' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:26:46 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:26:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>No, wearing Armani doesn&apos;t make you refined</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/126169/No%2Dwearing%2DArmani%2Ddoesnt%2Dmake%2Dyou%2Drefined</link>	
	<description>What specific traits do you look for in a person that say that s/he is refined? So I was reading about polymaths yesterday, and while these polymaths (or a further development being a Renaissance Man) excelled intellectually, I&apos;m wondering about the non-intellectual side of things as well.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What qualities in a person do you consider to be the most desirable, or show his/her refinement?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m looking for things that can be developed, not things that people are born with, so a natural good looks or sexual energy are out, but things like honor and erudition are in. At the risk of sounding a sexist, the term that springs to mind is &lt;em&gt;gentleman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sorry if this question is vague, but that&apos;s the best I could come up with.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.126169</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:26:46 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>gentleman</category>
	<category>polymath</category>
	<category>qualities</category>
	<category>refined</category>
	<dc:creator>titantoppler</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Is it possible to be a polymath these days?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/107554/Is%2Dit%2Dpossible%2Dto%2Dbe%2Da%2Dpolymath%2Dthese%2Ddays</link>	
	<description>Is it possible for somebody to be a true &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymath&quot;&gt;Renaissance Man&lt;/a&gt; these days, or has hyperspecialization taken us all as hostages forever?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.107554</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:20:40 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>knowledge</category>
	<category>polymath</category>
	<dc:creator>dcrocha</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Help me live in the Tower of Babel</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/101933/Help%2Dme%2Dlive%2Din%2Dthe%2DTower%2Dof%2DBabel</link>	
	<description>LanguageFilter: Having a little bit of a few languages under my belt, I&apos;d like to add more/get better at the ones I know.  Is it generally a better idea to master one language before proceeding on to another, or would it be good to study, say, 3 languages at once from the ground up?  How about grouping like families of languages (i.e. learn italian, spanish and french together)?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.101933</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:09:40 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>autodidact</category>
	<category>education</category>
	<category>language</category>
	<category>learning</category>
	<category>linguistics</category>
	<category>polymath</category>
	<dc:creator>ikahime</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

