<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter posts tagged with plural</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/plural</link>
      <description>tag posts with plural</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:56:57 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:56:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>What is the plural of &quot;print out&quot;?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/90810/What-is-the-plural-of-print-out</link>	
	<description>What&apos;s the plural of &quot;print out,&quot; as in, &quot;hey John, if you&apos;re going near the printer could you get me that print out?&quot; What would we say to John if we wanted him to get us more than one?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.90810</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:56:57 -0800</pubDate>

<category>plural</category>

<category>print</category>

<category>printout</category>

	<dc:creator>ChasFile</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>HOW DO EXPRESS TEH IDEA OF MORE TAHN ONE BEATIN&apos; ???</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/87303/HOW-DO-EXPRESS-TEH-IDEA-OF-MORE-TAHN-ONE-BEATIN</link>	
	<description>How do I pluralize a contraction that already ends with an apostrophe? I was just IMing with a friend and needed to pluralize the word beatin&apos;, which ends with an apostrophe. If I were to just add an s, I&apos;d get:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
beatin&apos;s&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That looks like the possessive form of &quot;beatin&quot; and is totally wrong. Alternatively, I could put the apostrophe at the end, but that makes even less sense.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.87303</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:26:57 -0800</pubDate>

<category>grammar</category>

<category>spelling</category>

<category>apostrophe</category>

<category>plural</category>

	<dc:creator>ignignokt</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>&quot;There is&quot; or &quot;There are&quot;</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/84536/There-is-or-There-are</link>	
	<description>English Grammar: &quot;There is&quot; vs. &quot;There are&quot;. There is a banana. There are two oranges. There (is / are) a banana and an orange? How about:&lt;br&gt;
There (is / are) a banana and two oranges?&lt;br&gt;
There (is / are) two oranges and a banana?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve searched on google for a definitive answer to this question. Most of the ESL lessons I&apos;ve come across avoid this kind of construction, altogether. I&apos;ve also stumbled on some discussions of the topic which seem pretty contradictory.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For the example sentences I provided, I think the following answers are correct: &quot;is&quot;, &quot;is&quot; and &quot;are&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I understand that the subjects of all of the sentences are plural, but I think that an ellipsis allows for the &quot;is&quot;, as in: There is a banana and (there is) an orange.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Can someone point me to a definitive answer?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.84536</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:53:41 -0800</pubDate>

<category>grammer</category>

<category>thereis</category>

<category>thereare</category>

<category>plural</category>

<category>singular</category>

	<dc:creator>syzygy</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Radioactive Mooses?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/62330/Radioactive-Mooses</link>	
	<description>pluralsfilter: Why don&apos;t we use words like &quot;radiations&quot;? It seems like a lot of words that have logical plurals don&apos;t ever get used in english. Radiations means essentially the same thing as emanations or emissions, but we don&apos;t use it the same way. Why is this? Where can I find more information about why we drop the pluralization on some many words?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.62330</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 09:18:20 -0800</pubDate>

<category>plural</category>

<category>pluralization</category>

<category>single</category>

<category>word</category>

<category>why_o_why</category>

	<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>What do you call a group of ninjas?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48315/What-do-you-call-a-group-of-ninjas</link>	
	<description>What do you call a group of ninjas? You know, like gaggle of geese, murder of crows, school of fish, all that.  Does a group of ninjas have some sort of descriptor?  We&apos;re talking many people in halloween costumes, how to address them together.  The { blank }</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.48315</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:43:14 -0800</pubDate>

<category>ninjas</category>

<category>grammer</category>

<category>plural</category>

	<dc:creator>qbxk</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Is there a proper plural for &quot;ethnicity&quot;?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/34472/Is-there-a-proper-plural-for-ethnicity</link>	
	<description>Is &quot;ethnicities&quot; a proper plural of &quot;ethnicity&quot;?  I&apos;m editing a sentence containing a list, and I&apos;m concerned about parallelism.  The sentence is along these lines:  &lt;em&gt;&quot;Our organization reflects numerous cultures, backgrounds, ethnicity, and experiences.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  To me, &quot;ethnicities&quot; reads better, but I&apos;m not sure it&apos;s a proper word.  If not, is &quot;ethnicity&quot; a proper plural, or would &quot;ethnic backgrounds&quot; work better?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.34472</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:34:20 -0800</pubDate>

<category>grammar</category>

<category>plural</category>

<category>parallelism</category>

	<dc:creator>pardonyou?</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Question number 13063</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/13063</link>	
	<description>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/37898&quot;&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;... you&apos;re probably aware that Clear Channel own ...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What is the DEAL with verb/subject disagreement when it comes to corporate entities??  Clear Channel is an IT!  Likewise band names.  I can&apos;t remember how many articles I&apos;ve read with phrases like &quot;Metallica are...&quot; or &quot;Led Zeppelin are...&quot;  Why is this OK in the music business?  I know this is mostly rant-y, but I&apos;m genuinely curious if anyone has, like, the Rolling Stone Style Guide or something.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.13063</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:38:10 -0800</pubDate>

<category>corporate</category>

<category>corporations</category>

<category>names</category>

<category>collectivenouns</category>

<category>collective</category>

<category>plural</category>

<category>groups</category>

	<dc:creator>rkent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

