<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with plural</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/plural</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'plural' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:55:07 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:55:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Possessive?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/138816/Possessive</link>	
	<description>Where should the apostrophe go in the sentence &quot;In Memory of Great Loves Lost&quot;? Loves is plural (referring to all the loving in the world), but does it possess &quot;lost&quot;? Should it be loves&apos;? The closest example is Shakespeare&apos;s &quot;Love&apos;s Labour&apos;s Lost&quot;, but people apostrophe it many different ways. I&apos;ve also tried to find where this example should go on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://apostrophe.me/&quot;&gt;amazing apostrophe chart&lt;/a&gt; that was posted here a while back, but I am still uncertain.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.138816</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:55:07 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>apostrophe</category>
	<category>editing</category>
	<category>plural</category>
	<category>possessive</category>
	<category>resolved</category>
	<category>sentence</category>
	<dc:creator>niccolo</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Any questions not answered in #2 pencil will receive a score of zero</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/130068/Any%2Dquestions%2Dnot%2Danswered%2Din%2D2%2Dpencil%2Dwill%2Dreceive%2Da%2Dscore%2Dof%2Dzero</link>	
	<description>Grammarfilter!  Oh my.  Is it &quot;X and Y are two side of the same coin&quot; or &quot;X and Y two sides of the same coin&quot;?  This was an SAT sample question, and I, a poor girl&apos;s tutor, swore that &quot;sides&quot; must be plural in this context.  Then the sample test website told me I was wrong, that it&apos;s &quot;two side&quot;. Bonus: The website also told me that my understanding of the perfect aspect was suspect, via: &lt;br&gt;
&quot;If only I had read the instruction manual before taking apart the engine.&quot; WRONG (this was apparently simple past?)&lt;br&gt;
&quot;If only I read the manual before taking apart the engine.&quot; CORRECT (this is perfect?)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;d appreciate some resolution here.  Now, granted, my use of grammar isn&apos;t perfect in this particular question, but that&apos;s because, hello, people don&apos;t speak in &quot;perfect&quot; College Board grammar, nor is my particular specialty SAT English requirements.  I&apos;m a language coach, as dopey as that sounds.  I work with fairly advanced ESL students to kind of drag the language out of them, with significant explanation of BASIC grammar in their NATIVE language.  Which is to say that I&apos;m an expert in English as it&apos;s used, not as prescriptivists think it ought to be.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Disclaimer: I took our apparently unwitting client because my boss told me to.  I&apos;m kind of stuck with this girl, and I want to do right by her, so I&apos;m asking.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m 99.99% sure I&apos;m right in both these questions, but I need some freakin&apos; professional help here.  Do I really suck at perfect tense?  Am I one of a majority who&apos;s out butchering an idiom that ought to be a torchlight for proper plural development?  Any and all criticism and links are welcome.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.130068</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:24:37 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>ESL</category>
	<category>grammar</category>
	<category>perfectaspect</category>
	<category>perfecttense</category>
	<category>plural</category>
	<category>SAT</category>
	<category>uncountablenoun</category>
	<dc:creator>saysthis</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Are there singular/plural pairs in english with completely different spellings?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/102722/Are%2Dthere%2Dsingularplural%2Dpairs%2Din%2Denglish%2Dwith%2Dcompletely%2Ddifferent%2Dspellings</link>	
	<description>In French, the singular of eye is &quot;oiel&quot; and the plural is &quot;yeux.&quot;  Are there any nouns in English that have completely different spellings of the singular and plural like this?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.102722</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:41:58 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>english</category>
	<category>french</category>
	<category>grammar</category>
	<category>language</category>
	<category>plural</category>
	<category>singular</category>
	<category>spelling</category>
	<category>trivia</category>
	<dc:creator>Crosius</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>a blessing, a doom and a pryde walk into a bar...</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/101349/a%2Dblessing%2Da%2Ddoom%2Dand%2Da%2Dpryde%2Dwalk%2Dinto%2Da%2Dbar</link>	
	<description>You have a murder of crows, sleuth of bears, even an exaltation of	larks, what about Fairies?  the only other mythical creatures I&apos;ve been able to find collective nouns for are Unicorns (a blessing), Sasquatch (a pod), Griffins (a pryde), and Dragons (a doom)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In a recent conversation with a friend, he mentioned that &quot;Goldbond Medicated Powder is like a squadron of fairies blowing on my testicles.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
clearly a squadron just feels wrong in this sentence (among so many other things that are wrong with this sentence...) so what would the right collective noun be for a pack of pixies?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.101349</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:25:57 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>collectivenouns</category>
	<category>fairies</category>
	<category>grammar</category>
	<category>plural</category>
	<dc:creator>jrishel</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>What is the plural of &quot;print out&quot;?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/90810/What%2Dis%2Dthe%2Dplural%2Dof%2Dprint%2Dout</link>	
	<description>What&apos;s the plural of &quot;print out,&quot; as in, &quot;hey John, if you&apos;re going near the printer could you get me that print out?&quot; What would we say to John if we wanted him to get us more than one?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.90810</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:56:57 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>plural</category>
	<category>print</category>
	<category>printout</category>
	<dc:creator>ChasFile</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>HOW DO EXPRESS TEH IDEA OF MORE TAHN ONE BEATIN&apos; ???</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/87303/HOW%2DDO%2DEXPRESS%2DTEH%2DIDEA%2DOF%2DMORE%2DTAHN%2DONE%2DBEATIN</link>	
	<description>How do I pluralize a contraction that already ends with an apostrophe? I was just IMing with a friend and needed to pluralize the word beatin&apos;, which ends with an apostrophe. If I were to just add an s, I&apos;d get:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
beatin&apos;s&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That looks like the possessive form of &quot;beatin&quot; and is totally wrong. Alternatively, I could put the apostrophe at the end, but that makes even less sense.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.87303</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:26:57 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>apostrophe</category>
	<category>grammar</category>
	<category>plural</category>
	<category>spelling</category>
	<dc:creator>ignignokt</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>&quot;There is&quot; or &quot;There are&quot;</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/84536/There%2Dis%2Dor%2DThere%2Dare</link>	
	<description>English Grammar: &quot;There is&quot; vs. &quot;There are&quot;. There is a banana. There are two oranges. There (is / are) a banana and an orange? How about:&lt;br&gt;
There (is / are) a banana and two oranges?&lt;br&gt;
There (is / are) two oranges and a banana?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve searched on google for a definitive answer to this question. Most of the ESL lessons I&apos;ve come across avoid this kind of construction, altogether. I&apos;ve also stumbled on some discussions of the topic which seem pretty contradictory.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For the example sentences I provided, I think the following answers are correct: &quot;is&quot;, &quot;is&quot; and &quot;are&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I understand that the subjects of all of the sentences are plural, but I think that an ellipsis allows for the &quot;is&quot;, as in: There is a banana and (there is) an orange.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Can someone point me to a definitive answer?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.84536</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:53:41 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>grammer</category>
	<category>plural</category>
	<category>resolved</category>
	<category>singular</category>
	<category>thereare</category>
	<category>thereis</category>
	<dc:creator>syzygy</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Radioactive Mooses?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/62330/Radioactive%2DMooses</link>	
	<description>pluralsfilter: Why don&apos;t we use words like &quot;radiations&quot;? It seems like a lot of words that have logical plurals don&apos;t ever get used in english. Radiations means essentially the same thing as emanations or emissions, but we don&apos;t use it the same way. Why is this? Where can I find more information about why we drop the pluralization on some many words?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.62330</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 09:18:20 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>plural</category>
	<category>pluralization</category>
	<category>single</category>
	<category>why_o_why</category>
	<category>word</category>
	<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>What do you call a group of ninjas?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/48315/What%2Ddo%2Dyou%2Dcall%2Da%2Dgroup%2Dof%2Dninjas</link>	
	<description>What do you call a group of ninjas? You know, like gaggle of geese, murder of crows, school of fish, all that.  Does a group of ninjas have some sort of descriptor?  We&apos;re talking many people in halloween costumes, how to address them together.  The { blank }</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.48315</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:43:14 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>grammer</category>
	<category>ninjas</category>
	<category>plural</category>
	<dc:creator>qbxk</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Is there a proper plural for &quot;ethnicity&quot;?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/34472/Is%2Dthere%2Da%2Dproper%2Dplural%2Dfor%2Dethnicity</link>	
	<description>Is &quot;ethnicities&quot; a proper plural of &quot;ethnicity&quot;?  I&apos;m editing a sentence containing a list, and I&apos;m concerned about parallelism.  The sentence is along these lines:  &lt;em&gt;&quot;Our organization reflects numerous cultures, backgrounds, ethnicity, and experiences.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  To me, &quot;ethnicities&quot; reads better, but I&apos;m not sure it&apos;s a proper word.  If not, is &quot;ethnicity&quot; a proper plural, or would &quot;ethnic backgrounds&quot; work better?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.34472</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>grammar</category>
	<category>parallelism</category>
	<category>plural</category>
	<dc:creator>pardonyou?</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Subjects and Verbs</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/13063/Subjects%2Dand%2DVerbs</link>	
	<description>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/37898&quot;&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;... you&apos;re probably aware that Clear Channel own ...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What is the DEAL with verb/subject disagreement when it comes to corporate entities??  Clear Channel is an IT!  Likewise band names.  I can&apos;t remember how many articles I&apos;ve read with phrases like &quot;Metallica are...&quot; or &quot;Led Zeppelin are...&quot;  Why is this OK in the music business?  I know this is mostly rant-y, but I&apos;m genuinely curious if anyone has, like, the Rolling Stone Style Guide or something.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.13063</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:38:10 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>collective</category>
	<category>collectivenouns</category>
	<category>corporate</category>
	<category>corporations</category>
	<category>groups</category>
	<category>names</category>
	<category>plural</category>
	<dc:creator>rkent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

