<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with phenotype</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/phenotype</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'phenotype' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:00:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:00:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Why do female olympic swimmers have the body type they do?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/95792/Why%2Ddo%2Dfemale%2Dolympic%2Dswimmers%2Dhave%2Dthe%2Dbody%2Dtype%2Dthey%2Ddo</link>	
	<description>Why do even olympic level swimmers (especially women) appear to have a &quot;thin layer of fat over muscle&quot; look rather than having the extreme muscle definition of say, sprinters? Mrs. True and I are watching the US Olympic Trials and it seems to a consistent body type. Clearly they are in peak physical condition but even the short distance sprint swimmers seem to be be a little &apos;thicker&apos; than other athletes at that level (especially in the torso and arms). Is there something about swimming that makes this the ideal body type for women, or is it a side effect of swimming itself?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.95792</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:00:19 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>body</category>
	<category>muscle</category>
	<category>olympics</category>
	<category>phenotype</category>
	<category>Sport</category>
	<dc:creator>true</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Are memes just the extended phenotype?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/58532/Are%2Dmemes%2Djust%2Dthe%2Dextended%2Dphenotype</link>	
	<description>How are memes anything other than an extension/expression of the extended phenotype? And I mean &quot;phenotype&quot; in the generalized-Richard Dawkins-sense.  It seems the meme meme is taken so seriously by so many, but I can&apos;t figure out how they are anything other than an interesting thought experiment/model.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Could someone please step off the meme-wagon and explain it to me--are memes anything other than an extension/expression of the extended phenotype?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m confused about this, so I hope I&apos;m not sounding like an idiot--please forgive me if I do.  Be gentle.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.58532</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:46:11 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>dawkins</category>
	<category>meme</category>
	<category>memes</category>
	<category>phenotype</category>
	<dc:creator>whatgorilla</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

