<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with osmosis</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/osmosis</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'osmosis' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:06:16 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:06:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Is there a word that means &quot;knowing something solely by references to it?&quot;</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/82672/Is%2Dthere%2Da%2Dword%2Dthat%2Dmeans%2Dknowing%2Dsomething%2Dsolely%2Dby%2Dreferences%2Dto%2Dit</link>	
	<description>Is there a word that means &quot;knowing something solely by references to it?&quot; I&apos;ve never seen an episode of Star Trek nor any of the movies. I haven&apos;t seen Spinal Tap nor 2001: A Space Odyssey. However, I know so much of what happens and the basic facts of each that I could fake it well -- I bet that there&apos;s at least one comparable thing in pop culture for every MeFite. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve used the slightly-awkward portmanteau &apos;recumference&apos; for this sort of thing for a while now, but I&apos;ve always wanted to know if there&apos;s an actual word for this.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.82672</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:06:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>culturalosmosis</category>
	<category>culture</category>
	<category>osmosis</category>
	<category>popculture</category>
	<category>recumference</category>
	<category>reference</category>
	<category>referential</category>
	<category>resolved</category>
	<category>word</category>
	<category>words</category>
	<dc:creator>flatluigi</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Why are there no freshwater squid?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/57955/Why%2Dare%2Dthere%2Dno%2Dfreshwater%2Dsquid</link>	
	<description>Why are there no freshwater squid?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.57955</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:13:43 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>biology</category>
	<category>evolution</category>
	<category>osmosis</category>
	<category>zoology</category>
	<dc:creator>jonesor</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Water temp to maximize hydration speed?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/53852/Water%2Dtemp%2Dto%2Dmaximize%2Dhydration%2Dspeed</link>	
	<description>What temperature water will hydrate one fastest? Is it hot, cold, or somewhere in between?  (And why?)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My friend says hot water is best.  In which case, is cold water &quot;refreshing&quot; only because of its thermoregulatory properties, not because of how fast it quenches one&apos;s thirst?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.53852</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:02:53 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>hydration</category>
	<category>osmosis</category>
	<category>temperature</category>
	<category>thirst</category>
	<category>water</category>
	<dc:creator>Humpable Prose</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

