<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with nameoftherose</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/nameoftherose</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'nameoftherose' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:01:36 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:01:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>How to sharpen acuity?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/123092/How%2Dto%2Dsharpen%2Dacuity</link>	
	<description>I pride myself in being a &lt;a href=&quot;https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/html/1807/4350/poem274.html&quot;&gt;&quot;picker-up of learning&apos;s crumbs&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (R. Browning) and an aspiring &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymath&quot;&gt;polymath&lt;/a&gt;, but I have atrocious observational skills.  How do I fix this? Ideally, I would like to hone them in such a way as to utilize my personal erudition to somewhat accurately reach a conclusion about a given situation, a la &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Name_of_the_Rose&quot;&gt;William of Baskerville&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes&quot;&gt;Sherlock Holmes&lt;/a&gt;.  Heck, we&apos;ll throw in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psych&quot;&gt;Shawn Spencer&lt;/a&gt; for good measure.  Is there a specific term that describes this (for further research), or is this merely a form of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mentalism&quot;&gt;mentalism&lt;/a&gt;?  Heightened acuity?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Suggestions?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(It should be noted that I do not want tools merely to make snap-judgments about people, as suggested in &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/90078/Reading-people-by-observing-subtle-mannerisms&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/42734/Moving-out-of-ones-own-head&quot;&gt;threads&lt;/a&gt;.)</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.123092</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:01:36 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>acuity</category>
	<category>mentalism</category>
	<category>nameoftherose</category>
	<category>observant</category>
	<category>observation</category>
	<category>sherlockholmes</category>
	<category>skill</category>
	<category>williamofbaskerville</category>
	<dc:creator>litterateur</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Is there a rose in the book The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/13566/Is%2Dthere%2Da%2Drose%2Din%2Dthe%2Dbook%2DThe%2DName%2Dof%2Dthe%2DRose%2Dby%2DUmberto%2DEco</link>	
	<description>In the book The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco, is there a rose in the book? I think I might have missed that reference. What name and what rose is the title referring to?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.13566</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:17:05 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>book</category>
	<category>literature</category>
	<category>nameoftherose</category>
	<category>rose</category>
	<category>umbertoeco</category>
	<dc:creator>timyang</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

