<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with moralabsolutism</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/moralabsolutism</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'moralabsolutism' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:54:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:54:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Who was Reagan&apos;s theologian of apocalypse?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/30877/Who%2Dwas%2DReagans%2Dtheologian%2Dof%2Dapocalypse</link>	
	<description>A tough one: I remember reading that during the Reagan years, as part of the campaign to convince the Russians that the US really would launch a second strike if faced with a preemptive Russian attack, Reagan turned to a religious figure or theologian who explained that a retaliatory attack, even if it resulted in the extinction of the human species, would be morally approvable and even required by God, and that it would serve the glory of God, despite the unfortunate consequences it might have for human beings.

I don&apos;t think I just imagined all this, so I wonder: who was the religious person that articulated this position?  What source can tell me about this stuff?  Many thanks for any clues.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.30877</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:54:34 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>ethics</category>
	<category>mad</category>
	<category>moralabsolutism</category>
	<category>nuclearwar</category>
	<category>reagan</category>
	<category>theology</category>
	<dc:creator>washburn</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

