<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with money_saving</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/money_saving</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'money_saving' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:14:08 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:14:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>IM versus Email in corporate environment</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24756/IM%2Dversus%2DEmail%2Din%2Dcorporate%2Denvironment</link>	
	<description>I would like to do a comparative analysis of the use of Instant Messaging versus email in my company&apos;s internal environment. Can anyone recommend from personal experience and/or resources, reasoning that would demonstrate IM to be more beneficial than the perpetual chain of conversational email?  For example, &quot;thank yous&quot;.  While polite, if there are thousands of &quot;thank you&quot; emails being sent, would you consider that of significant cost to the business?  Further, people exchange emails back and forth as though it is chat...wouldn&apos;t it be better to do this on chat and not waste server space?  Any thoughts in support of this idea, as well as the contrary, are welcome.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24756</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:14:08 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>money_saving</category>
	<category>productivity</category>
	<dc:creator>mic stand</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

