<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with lukewarm</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/lukewarm</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'lukewarm' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:25:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:25:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>The reverse-Goldilocks phenomenon</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/63425/The%2DreverseGoldilocks%2Dphenomenon</link>	
	<description>Why do people seem to prefer food that&apos;s very cold or very hot to food that&apos;s more of a medium temperature? You often hear: &quot;Don&apos;t let your dinner [or coffee, etc.] get cold!&quot; &quot;Oh no, this beer [or soda, etc.] is warm!&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On the positive side, people love a &quot;nice cold [beverage]&quot; or a &quot;piping hot [meal],&quot; whereas you don&apos;t hear people exulting over a &quot;nice lukewarm [anything].&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To be sure, there are exceptions. Cheese is good at room temperature, for instance. But for the most part, there seems to be a universally shared understanding that there&apos;s something special about foods and beverages that are either very hot or very cold, and that they shouldn&apos;t be allowed to drift into the middle zone.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Why? Is there any scientific basis for this?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.63425</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:25:48 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>beverage</category>
	<category>cold</category>
	<category>food</category>
	<category>hot</category>
	<category>lukewarm</category>
	<category>temperature</category>
	<dc:creator>Jaltcoh</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Where&apos;s the spark?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/31713/Wheres%2Dthe%2Dspark</link>	
	<description>I met a girl in December and have been seeing her for a couple of weeks. While I enjoy hanging out with her, it doesn&apos;t seem totally amazing like the beginning of some of my previous relationships. A few months ago I would have just ended this here but now I am not so sure.
You see, after my last relationship (which ended fairly recently) I swore that in the next one I wouldn&apos;t let myself get obsessive immediately, spending all my time and thoughts when the next new person comes along. So... I haven&apos;t. But while I&apos;m less anxious than I have been in the past, and am not letting my thoughts be totally consumed by her, there also seems to be a missing spark for me. I don&apos;t look forward to making plans with her like I might otherwise, and seem more interested in the prospect of other women than I would have at this stage of a relationship in the past.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Am I just becoming more mature? More jaded? Or is this just not the right relationship for me? Would I be cheating myself out of a chance for happiness by not continuing this relationship? Or am I cheating myself by continuing with it? Is it possible to let yourself fall for someone without totally losing yourself? Or by holding myself back do I doom myself to further lukewarm attachments?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What should I do?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you want to make an anonymous comment, please send to anonymous.ask.metafilter at gmail. Thank you.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.31713</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:50:33 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>dating</category>
	<category>lukewarm</category>
	<category>relationships</category>
	<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

