<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with knowthyself</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/knowthyself</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'knowthyself' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:19:53 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:19:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>What does it mean to &quot;be yourself?&quot;</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42299/What%2Ddoes%2Dit%2Dmean%2Dto%2Dbe%2Dyourself</link>	
	<description>How do you &quot;be yourself?&quot; It seems intuitively people know how to &quot;be yourself.&quot; However, I have a few problems:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
- It seems paradoxical. How can you NOT be anything but yourself? It&apos;s like the oxymoron &quot;act naturally.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
- One of my inner desires involves the supression of my flaws and self-improvement. If I were to &quot;be myself,&quot; would that involve surpressing that desire? If so, then is &quot;being yourself&quot; contradictory to change?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
- Where does learning fit in? You may hear the aphorism &quot;be yourself&quot; when your friend notices you acting uptight at a club. However, a few minutes later, he may offer some criticism of your social behavior, such as, &quot;stop acting the fool.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In my limited literature review, I found a two locii: identity crisis and self-actualization.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Identity crisis involves situations where people are committing to a false identity. But what makes one identity false and other&apos;s not?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Self-actualization is one of Maslow&apos;s terms, which involves cultivating your true potential. Again, what is your true potential? Here is &lt;a href=&quot;http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/:/papers/Maslow.pdf&quot;&gt;some criticism from Heylighen&lt;/a&gt; [pdf]:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Though the need hierarchy seems relatively simple and consistent, the concept of self-actualization is not clearly defined. There is a difficulty with the concept of &quot;actualization&quot; itself, because it presupposes that there is somehow a well-defined set of potential talents an individual is capable of developing, but a human system is much too complex to allow the discrimination between &quot;potential&quot; developments and &quot;impossible&quot; ones.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Greeks inscribed the maxim &quot;Know Thyself&quot; on the Sun god Apollo&apos;s Oracle of Delphi temple. However, I&apos;ve studied myself, written countless journal entries, and seem to know every little thing about myself. And yet, I don&apos;t really think I&apos;m being myself.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
However, this may have something more to do with &quot;self-acceptance.&quot; But then again, where do you draw the line between self-acceptance and challenging your limits?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What strategies do you employ to &quot;be yourself?&quot;</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.42299</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:19:53 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>beyourself</category>
	<category>humanisiticpsychology</category>
	<category>identitycrisis</category>
	<category>knowthyself</category>
	<category>maxim</category>
	<category>positivepsychology</category>
	<category>psychology</category>
	<category>self-acceptance</category>
	<category>self-actualization</category>
	<dc:creator>philosophistry</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

