<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with judithjarvisthomspson</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/judithjarvisthomspson</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'judithjarvisthomspson' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:03:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:03:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Great papers in ethics?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/99578/Great%2Dpapers%2Din%2Dethics</link>	
	<description>I&apos;m looking for paradigmatic ethics papers. Specifically, I&apos;d like papers that are as clear and influential as Singer&apos;s &quot;Famine, Affluence, and Morality&quot; and Thomson&apos;s &quot;A Defense of Abortion.&quot; The papers do not have to be on charity or abortion, in fact, it would be nice to have a paper on some other problem in ethics. Also, I would like the paper to eschew too much theory talk (as the Singer and Thompson papers). &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, could you offer a brief description and a comment on why you like the paper?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.99578</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:03:48 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>ethics</category>
	<category>judithjarvisthomspson</category>
	<category>petersinger</category>
	<category>philosophy</category>
	<category>resolved</category>
	<category>singer</category>
	<category>syllabus</category>
	<category>thompson</category>
	<dc:creator>oddman</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

