<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with inputdevice</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/inputdevice</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'inputdevice' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:44:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:44:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>If a digital camera says it can handle USB 2.0, does that mean it won&apos;t work in a USB 1.0 port?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/42238/If%2Da%2Ddigital%2Dcamera%2Dsays%2Dit%2Dcan%2Dhandle%2DUSB%2D20%2Ddoes%2Dthat%2Dmean%2Dit%2Dwont%2Dwork%2Din%2Da%2DUSB%2D10%2Dport</link>	
	<description>If a digital camera says it can handle USB 2.0, does that mean it won&apos;t work in a USB 1.0 port?  I&apos;m in the market for a digital camera, and have been looking at the Canon PowerShot series, namely the A620, SD450, and SD600.  All of these have USB 2.0 listed as the interface.  However, my 800mhz G4 Powerbook has USB 1.0.  Does this mean those cameras won&apos;t play nice with my laptop?  </description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.42238</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:44:29 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>camera</category>
	<category>canon</category>
	<category>digitalcamera</category>
	<category>inputdevice</category>
	<category>photography</category>
	<category>powerbook</category>
	<category>usb</category>
	<dc:creator>invisible ink</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

