<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with humanknowledge</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/humanknowledge</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'humanknowledge' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:24:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:24:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>What happens to the Library of Congress when the asteroid hits?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/47670/What%2Dhappens%2Dto%2Dthe%2DLibrary%2Dof%2DCongress%2Dwhen%2Dthe%2Dasteroid%2Dhits</link>	
	<description>What efforts are currently being made to preserve human knowledge and culture (great literature, scientific theory, et cetera) for far-future generations, or in the event of a worldwide catastrophe? I&apos;m thinking about something with the same kind of timescale as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.longnow.org/&quot;&gt;Long Now&lt;/a&gt; project.  I feel there must be an archival project of this type out there, but my Google-fu has failed me on this one.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.47670</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:24:05 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>archive</category>
	<category>humanknowledge</category>
	<category>library</category>
	<category>postapocalyptic</category>
	<dc:creator>fermion</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>How do we jump into a closed set?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/35208/How%2Ddo%2Dwe%2Djump%2Dinto%2Da%2Dclosed%2Dset</link>	
	<description>If humans communicate via symbols and can only understand something (i.e., give it some semiotic &apos;identity&apos;) by way of comparison to already-familiar things, how do we begin at all? If the identity we assign to something&#8212;insofar as we acquire whatever &apos;stuff&apos; we need to make it a topic of conversation&#8212;has its roots in things we already understand, we&apos;re breaking into a closed set. WTF?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I get what Pinker said about innate capacity for language, but a CPU&apos;s innate capacity to act on certain instructions to produce certain results doesn&apos;t generate any input for it to process...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m posting this in Science &amp;amp; Nature because I have more input from Philosophy and Religion than I can handle already. But if you&apos;ve got some stellar rebuttal of Aristotelian logic, or some especially clever intellectual poo-flinging that shuts Augustine down, don&apos;t let me stop you.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.35208</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 06:52:27 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>Augustine&apos;sHobbyHorse</category>
	<category>ClosedSets</category>
	<category>HumanKnowledge</category>
	<dc:creator>Yeomans</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

