<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with hazel</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/hazel</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'hazel' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:48:12 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:48:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Quicksilver loses track of moved files. Why no?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/115507/Quicksilver%2Dloses%2Dtrack%2Dof%2Dmoved%2Dfiles%2DWhy%2Dno</link>	
	<description>How can I get Quicksilver to keep track of files that have moved? I&apos;m running QS B54 on OS X Leopard, and love the heck out of it, but I have only one problem with it (beyond some minor buggy lack of functionality since a1c0r stopped supporting it, anyway).  The problem is that I&apos;m also running Hazel, and I have a rule set up that scans for anything in my Documents folder that&apos;s been untouched for more than &lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; weeks and moves it to a subfolder labeled &quot;Archive.&quot;  Keeps only new and relevant stuff in Documents, so it&apos;s easier to browse.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
However, I&apos;ve noticed that after Hazel moves a file, QS can&apos;t see it anymore.  If I go browsing for a file in my archive folder and manually open it, then QS again has it indexed, but I&apos;d rather (if this is possible) somehow configure QS so it keeps track of the file or folder  even after it&apos;s been archived.  Is there a way to do this?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.115507</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:48:12 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>apple</category>
	<category>archive</category>
	<category>archiving</category>
	<category>hazel</category>
	<category>mac</category>
	<category>macintosh</category>
	<category>osx</category>
	<category>qs</category>
	<category>quicksilver</category>
	<dc:creator>middleclasstool</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Which Hazel?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/98000/Which%2DHazel</link>	
	<description>I am a Mac owner who bought &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.noodlesoft.com/faq.php&quot;&gt;Hazel&lt;/a&gt;, an application that will do a number of different tasks to your files based on certain rules.  (Think of it as Outlook rules for your Mac desktop.)  However, I&apos;ve really found myself stumped as to what to &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; with it, and it&apos;s basically just been sitting on my machine unused.  If you have it, what do you do with it?  If you don&apos;t have it or have a Windows machine, do you have any good ideas for rule logic, or automated rules, to apply to files on your desktop, anyway?  Looks like it&apos;ll auto-run AppleScripts and Unix shell scripts, too.  Basically looking to tap other people&apos;s minds on this one since my own seems to be balking at this particular mental problem.  Thanks. &lt;small&gt;(Not Pepsi Blue.  I&apos;m in no way associated with the Hazel people.)&lt;/small&gt;</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.98000</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:42:13 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>filing</category>
	<category>hazel</category>
	<category>macosx</category>
	<category>resolved</category>
	<category>rules</category>
	<dc:creator>WCityMike</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>What should be in my medicine chest?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/49270/What%2Dshould%2Dbe%2Din%2Dmy%2Dmedicine%2Dchest</link>	
	<description>For household first aid, should I use rubbing alcohol or hydrogen peroxide or witch hazel? Growing up, we only ever had rubbing alcohol in the house. Oral thermometers were wiped down with it after each use. Wounds would get washed with soap and water, then doused with rubbing alcohol, then bandaged. But I know others use hydogen peroxide for the same purpose, and someone recently said to me that they use witch hazel. &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/38237&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; previous thread suggests that hydrogen peroxide is not a true disinfectant. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What are the proper uses, and drawbacks, of these three substances?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.49270</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:57:55 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>aid</category>
	<category>alcohol</category>
	<category>antiseptic</category>
	<category>disinfectant</category>
	<category>first</category>
	<category>firstaid</category>
	<category>hazel</category>
	<category>hydrogen</category>
	<category>hydrogenperoxide</category>
	<category>isopropyl</category>
	<category>medical</category>
	<category>peroxide</category>
	<category>rubbing</category>
	<category>rubbingalcohol</category>
	<category>witch</category>
	<category>witchhazel</category>
	<dc:creator>LobsterMitten</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

