<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with guidelines</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/guidelines</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'guidelines' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:19:10 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:19:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Where&apos;s the website Startup button?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/138829/Wheres%2Dthe%2Dwebsite%2DStartup%2Dbutton</link>	
	<description>I want to create a website and need general and specific guidance. I don&apos;t want to give the idea away so the description is a little sketchy. 
How do I deal with keeping the kids out of the &quot;adult&quot; section? How do I &quot;spread the word&quot;? (to get submissions and readers?; i.e. kickstart) I am considering a WordPress engine and Nearly Free Speech for hosting (at least at the start). Is that reasonable to use? I have not purchased the domain yet.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The website will mostly deal with user submitted documents; I am not really sure I know how to get the submissions: users scan things and email or upload the files. Should I allow submissions to me snail mailed in and I scan them? (I don&apos;t want to be required to return them, I think)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I know that some of these things will end up being the &quot;adults only&quot; type (I&apos;m OK with that), but I want to keep the kiddies out of there. Require a registration for that section? What qualifications do I ask for?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is it reasonable/acceptable/advisable to accept PayPal donations for upkeep? What about advertising? what&apos;s the best way? (I don&apos;t want to go with the obnoxious popups and horrific banners if I can help it)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is it possible to make a buck or two if it is popular? I&apos;m not looking to make a real killing, mostly pay for the effort and costs.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
How does one select and &quot;promote&quot; moderators that will keep in line with the original concept of the site?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
When do I bust the cherry and put it on MeTa&apos;s Projects section?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What have I not covered??&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyone &quot;volunteer&quot; to answer specific questions after I get started?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.138829</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:19:10 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>adult</category>
	<category>advertising</category>
	<category>guidelines</category>
	<category>website</category>
	<dc:creator>Drasher</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Profiting from the Feed Icon ?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/111516/Profiting%2Dfrom%2Dthe%2DFeed%2DIcon</link>	
	<description>Profiting from the Feed Icon ? graphics.design.legal.filter.dot.dot.dot...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If I wanted to do a design that includes the Feed Icon as the main focus (but not as the main subject) and the icon is only seen in less than ~25% of the design as a small element or if the Feed Icon is broken up in half or in a few pieces, would that be &quot;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;okay&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/feed-icon-guidelines/faq.html&quot;&gt;Mozilla&apos;s Feed Icon Guidelines&lt;/a&gt;? The design would then be sold for profit of course.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you read the last 3 answers/paragraphs on their guidelines, it is really loosely written. So what is stopping people from making Feed Icon designs and selling them as t-shirts and mouse pads on CafePress?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you check iStockphoto, there are people who sell the actual icon file with little to no accompanied designs/artwork: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.istockphoto.com/file_search.php?action=file&amp;text=rss+feed+icon&quot;&gt;http://www.istockphoto.com/file_search.php?action=file&amp;amp;text=rss+feed+icon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.111516</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:58:54 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>design</category>
	<category>feed</category>
	<category>graphics</category>
	<category>guidelines</category>
	<category>icon</category>
	<category>mozilla</category>
	<category>profit</category>
	<category>rss</category>
	<dc:creator>querty</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>How do I manage my online privacy, when I have friends who blog?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/87586/How%2Ddo%2DI%2Dmanage%2Dmy%2Donline%2Dprivacy%2Dwhen%2DI%2Dhave%2Dfriends%2Dwho%2Dblog</link>	
	<description>As more of my friends take up blogging, it becomes nearly inevitable that I&apos;m going to show up in a blog post somewhere.  This makes me somewhat uncomfortable.  Is my discomfort justified?  And if it is, what guidelines can/should I ask these blogging friends to follow to protect my privacy? Several years ago, a guy I was dating blogged about a date we had been on, using my real first name, and it freaked me out.  While first names may not be traceable by strangers on the internet, I expect to eventually come into contact with friends/family/coworkers of my friends who write blogs. I&apos;m not happy about the prospect of a conversation coming to, &quot;Oh, you&apos;re the girl he wrote about that one time...&quot; even if the story was completely harmless.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That guy and I had a conversation after I saw the post.  He respected my wishes to be left out of the blog from then on, but he definitely thought I was overreacting.  Since then several more close friends and family members have taken up blogging, and I feel like it&apos;s overkill to ask them never to mention me.  I&apos;m just not sure what guidelines (if any) are appropriate.  I want to say, &quot;Sure, mention how much fun we all had volunteering last week, but please don&apos;t bring my name up in connection with the huge drunken party afterward,&quot; but that kind of micromanaging isn&apos;t really appropriate or feasible.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So - should I let these people write whatever they want, and ask them to remove something after the fact if it pushes my personal boundaries too far?  Should I give them advance warning that I don&apos;t want to be in their blog at all?  Should I tell them they can only refer to me by a pseudonym?  How do I mention my concerns to a blogger friend without coming off as a control freak?  Or am I really overreacting?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.87586</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:55:08 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>blog</category>
	<category>friends</category>
	<category>guidelines</category>
	<category>privacy</category>
	<dc:creator>vytae</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>To Touch a Child</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/53294/To%2DTouch%2Da%2DChild</link>	
	<description>Looking for guidelines on physically handling children at school.
I recently started being a playground &amp;amp; lunch supervisor at my son&apos;s school.&lt;br&gt;
The school system has no set guidlelines for how to handle children.&lt;br&gt;
I have set some self-imposed standards, like not being isolated with a child, touching only hands-arms-shoulders, not initiating hugs, and not yanking a child.&lt;br&gt;
Still, when I pulled a child who was angry and wouldn&apos;t stop yelling in the lunchline out of line to talk with her, she complained to the assistant principal.&lt;br&gt;
I have full support of the admin and staff, and want better guidelines.&lt;br&gt;
It is relevant that I&apos;m male, both in that I was told the school needed more males, and in that the children feel it is different.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve got an internal conflict whether to push officially for better guidelines.&lt;br&gt;
On the one hand, the male teachers at the school do great, and I don&apos;t want to interfere with what they do.&lt;br&gt;
On the other hand, I know of a professor at the local college, who worked at a private high school many years ago. &lt;br&gt;
He left after a sex-&amp;amp;-drugs scandal, but hush-hush with no record, and he has run a high-school summer program here.&lt;br&gt;
So the cracks are big for creeps to fall through.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The internets are loaded with opinions.&lt;br&gt;
Has anybody actually studied this?&lt;br&gt;
Do you know where any official guidelines are?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.53294</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:42:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>childcare</category>
	<category>children</category>
	<category>guidelines</category>
	<category>touch</category>
	<dc:creator>dragonsi55</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Proper way to describe a URL in print</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/7259/Proper%2Dway%2Dto%2Ddescribe%2Da%2DURL%2Din%2Dprint</link>	
	<description>Editors, tech-savvy folk, and grammar-obsessives, please help. I&apos;ve been arguing about this with my fellow editors: Is it acceptable, in nontechnical copy, to drop the &quot;http://&quot; from the beginning of a web address that doesn&apos;t have a &quot;www&quot; in its URL? Here&apos;s the deal. I work for a university. We want to direct prospective students to a particular area of our Web site--&lt;i&gt;foo.university.edu.&lt;/i&gt; I&apos;m in disagreement with the rest of the department in that I think that a)young adults are savvy enough to recognize a web address when they see one (the first argument given to me for keeping the &quot;http://&quot;) and b)most folks&apos; browsers are modern/intuitive enough that you don&apos;t have to type &quot;http://&quot; into the address bar before the web address (the second argument given). &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ucp.uchicago.edu:2001/search97cgi/s97_cgi?action=View&amp;VdkVgwKey=%2E%2E%2F%2E%2E%2FWWW%2Dbooks%2Fmain%2FMisc%2FChicago%2Fcmosfaq%2Fcmosfaq%2EInternetWebandOtherPost%2DWatergateConcerns%2Ehtml&amp;DocOffset=1&amp;DocsFound=1&amp;QueryZip=http&amp;Collection=C90&amp;SearchUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fucp%2Euchicago%2Eedu%3A2001%2Fsearch97cgi%2Fs97%5Fcgi%3Faction%3DFILTERSEARCH%26QueryZip%3Dhttp%26Filter%3Dcmosfaq%252Ehts%26ResultTemplate%3DCMOSfaqresults%252Ehts%26QueryText%3Dhttp%26Collection%3DC90%26ResultStart%3D1%26ResultCount%3D10&amp;&quot;&gt;Chicago&lt;/a&gt; seems keen on keeping the http off in running text, when one is describing a site but not directing readers to it. However, they seem to use &quot;http://&quot; in all references to URLs otherwise. This would back up my officemates&apos; argument.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Does anyone agree with my stance, that our department needs to get modern? Or am I in the wrong here? I find &quot;http://&quot; pretty damned visually jarring.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.7259</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 15:00:56 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>edit</category>
	<category>editing</category>
	<category>guideline</category>
	<category>guidelines</category>
	<category>http</category>
	<category>style</category>
	<dc:creator>cowboy_sally</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Public photography laws</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/4836/Public%2Dphotography%2Dlaws</link>	
	<description>I see lots of photographers with candid photos of strangers from the park, on the street, etc., but I&apos;m wary of getting sued just for taking some amateur photos.  What laws, guidlines, rules of thumb, etc., should I use when taking photos of people in public?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.4836</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:23:17 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>advice</category>
	<category>amateur</category>
	<category>guidelines</category>
	<category>law</category>
	<category>legal</category>
	<category>photo</category>
	<category>photography</category>
	<category>strangers</category>
	<dc:creator>oissubke</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

