<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with grimm</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/grimm</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'grimm' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:12:49 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:12:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Grimm&apos;s tales: stepmothers or real mothers?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/21287/Grimms%2Dtales%2Dstepmothers%2Dor%2Dreal%2Dmothers</link>	
	<description>Stepmothers in Grimm&apos;s fairy tales. Some claim that the Grimms altered mothers to step mothers lest the bourgeois reader be shocked. I was told this at university, and I&apos;ve since found several references online, but nothing that strikes me as authoritative or trustworthy. And I have an original Grimms Maerchen at home, and it&apos;s step-mothers all the way. I was about to &quot;enlighten&quot; someone, but now I&apos;m worried I&apos;m just perpetuating an untruth.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is this story of the Grimms&apos; redaction true, or just wishful thinking for step-parents?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.21287</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 01:12:49 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>fairytales</category>
	<category>grimm</category>
	<category>parents</category>
	<category>stepparents</category>
	<category>stories</category>
	<dc:creator>i_am_joe&apos;s_spleen</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

