Join 3,514 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)

2 posts tagged with grammar by phrontist.
Displaying 1 through 2 of 2.

Related tags:
+ (86)
+ (83)
+ (80)
+ (26)
+ (16)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (9)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)


Users that often use this tag:
Anonymous (6)
amtho (4)
angrycat (3)
Busoni (3)
shelayna (3)
sanskrtam (2)
Ghidorah (2)
christhelongtimelu... (2)
kristi (2)
CollectiveMind (2)
rinosaur (2)
philosophygeek (2)
FireStyle (2)
Dee Xtrovert (2)
Buddy-Rey (2)
krautland (2)
gman (2)
Lockeownzj00 (2)
phrontist (2)
sbutler (2)
stupidsexyFlanders (2)
Shane (2)
MiguelCardoso (2)
davebug (2)
grumblebee (2)

Help me subjugate the subjunctive, or I might get moody.

Yet Another English Grammar Question: Which is correct? Based on my facial expression right now, you would think I [were/was] excited. The former sounds wrong, but reading about subjunctive moods makes me think it's right. Does it matter whether I intend to imply that I was not in fact excited?
posted by phrontist on Nov 23, 2009 - 27 answers

And so I found myself asking this for some sort of reassurance, which question would be fielded by AskMefi's language nerds with bewildering rapidity

In David Foster Wallace's A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again he uses the word "which" in a way that I found unusual - a usage that is described under heading three here. I think I'm fairly well read, but I can't remember ever having seen this before. I've been having (what I think are) migraines lately and I'm curious if I'm becoming linguistically befuddled, or if this is just an obscure or archaic usage. Examples after the jump. [more inside]
posted by phrontist on Apr 20, 2009 - 28 answers

Page: 1