<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with equilateral</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/equilateral</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'equilateral' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:11:56 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:11:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Does isosceles subsume equilateral?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/15865/Does%2Disosceles%2Dsubsume%2Dequilateral</link>	
	<description>Are equilateral triangles also isosceles? My daughter was given homework in which she had to identify isosceles triangles. We decided that given the definition &quot;has two equal sides&quot;, an equilateral triangle must also be isosceles. Her maths teacher disagrees. It&apos;s been a long time since I did plane geometry, but I&apos;m sure that the formal definition was not &quot;two sides &lt;b&gt;only&lt;/b&gt;&quot;&lt;br&gt;
I can&apos;t find authoritative, unambiguous references on Google. I&apos;d love an online reference, but a dead-trees one would be good too.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m not going to buy a fight over geometry with a hapless primary school teacher but this is driving me nuts.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.15865</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:11:56 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>equilateral</category>
	<category>geometry</category>
	<category>homework</category>
	<category>isosceles</category>
	<category>triangle</category>
	<dc:creator>i_am_joe&apos;s_spleen</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

