<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with deuteronomy</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/deuteronomy</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'deuteronomy' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:38:41 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:38:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>The Old Testament God != The New Testament God?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/70413/The%2DOld%2DTestament%2DGod%2DThe%2DNew%2DTestament%2DGod</link>	
	<description>I&apos;m working my way through the Bible. At the moment, I&apos;m towards the end of Numbers. The past few books have been very heavy with detailed instructions on the various blood rituals God requires of his people &#8212; which animals to sacrifice, what manner to do it in, and lots of blood-splashing on the sides of the tent. I asked a Christian friend of mine about this, because, basically, I was wondering why these various intricacies of blood rituals weren&apos;t brought along through the history of Christianity. Catholicism doesn&apos;t require that pigeons or bulls be sacrificed in a certain way to appease the Lord, and, as far as I know, I don&apos;t believe it really ever did. I found her response rather fascinating: she said, &quot;That&apos;s not Christianity.&quot; She then went on to explain that Christ changed much of the edicts that were laid down in the Old Testament, as sort of a reinvention of the religion. I&apos;m wondering if people could elucidate on this. Is this a unique theological theory, or is this common Christian doctrine? If the latter, what prevents that from being applied to Old Testament dogma that is considered central to Christianity (I&apos;m thinking specifically of the Ten Commandments)? If it&apos;s just a theory, then what are the more conservative, Bible-is-quite-literal Christian denominations&apos; response to the question of the inconsistency of why these blood rituals (splashing blood around the tent; if x happens burn two pigeons on the altar; if y happens sacrifice a bull; being stoned to death for certain infractions; etc.) can be ignored but everything else is to be taken literally &#8212; since they believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible?  How does the everything-literally-happened variant of Christianity resolve the &quot;two Gods&quot; issue of the OT and NT being very different in their very essences?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.70413</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:38:41 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>bible</category>
	<category>deuteronomy</category>
	<category>exodus</category>
	<category>god</category>
	<category>numbers</category>
	<category>resolved</category>
	<category>rules</category>
	<dc:creator>WCityMike</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

