<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with debating</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/debating</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'debating' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:45:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:45:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>I want to be smart so I can write clever Askme Headlines</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/112810/I%2Dwant%2Dto%2Dbe%2Dsmart%2Dso%2DI%2Dcan%2Dwrite%2Dclever%2DAskme%2DHeadlines</link>	
	<description>What are some easy, relatively quick ways to learn to write better, think clearer, and express myself better?   There are a thousand reasons that I&apos;d like to learn more about everything, not that anyone should need a reason to want that.  Basically, when I&apos;m writing on Mefi or on my blog, I keep finding myself grasping for words to express myself and coming up short.  I know my grammer stinks as well.  I want books, movies, and other means and mediums by which I can raise my intelligence quota a little.  I&apos;m interested in not just learning to write better, but learning to think clearer, argue my beliefs and values better, and feel more enlightened all-around.  Extra points for pointing the way to &lt;b&gt;free&lt;/b&gt; and/or &apos;fun&apos; (ie: Nintendo DS games) paths to enlightenment.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.112810</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:45:34 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>arguing</category>
	<category>books</category>
	<category>debating</category>
	<category>english</category>
	<category>enlightenment</category>
	<category>grammer</category>
	<category>grasshopper</category>
	<category>intelligence</category>
	<category>knowledge</category>
	<category>learning</category>
	<category>math</category>
	<category>movies</category>
	<category>philosophy</category>
	<category>science</category>
	<category>smart</category>
	<category>smarter</category>
	<category>smartest</category>
	<category>speaking</category>
	<category>spelling</category>
	<category>thinking</category>
	<dc:creator>Bageena</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Anyone know any active debating forums?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/52507/Anyone%2Dknow%2Dany%2Dactive%2Ddebating%2Dforums</link>	
	<description>Anyone know any active debating forums/sites? Looking for websites dedicated exclusively to discussing/debating important topics (especially for finding arguments for and against a topic). Can anyone help?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.52507</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 06:51:57 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>debating</category>
	<category>discussing</category>
	<category>internetsites</category>
	<dc:creator>freddymetz</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>How to improve debating/arguing skills and general eloquence.</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/38417/How%2Dto%2Dimprove%2Ddebatingarguing%2Dskills%2Dand%2Dgeneral%2Deloquence</link>	
	<description>How do i go about improving my arguing/debating skills?  Obviously i know that going to some debating club is an obvious answer but i dont feel confident enough with my current ability. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Since a child i have always lacked confidence when expressing myself. I found writing essays difficult and even sometimes when disscussing topics I would always end up saying &quot;Oh whats that word&quot; or worse end up waffling. Im also a non confrontational person which means i never had lots of opportunities to improve. I dont want to become better to win verbal fights. I just want to be able to express my opinions and feel and look confident when i do so. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Are there any good sites/books or excercises i should read or do?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.38417</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 02:25:26 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>argue</category>
	<category>arguement</category>
	<category>debate</category>
	<category>debating</category>
	<category>eloquence</category>
	<category>eloquent</category>
	<dc:creator>thegeezer3</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Does anyone in the public eye use correct logic in arguments (anymore)?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/12144/Does%2Danyone%2Din%2Dthe%2Dpublic%2Deye%2Duse%2Dcorrect%2Dlogic%2Din%2Darguments%2Danymore</link>	
	<description>I have, per my Jesuit education, received too many logic courses. Many times I recognize people making the simplest of &lt;a href=&quot;http://fallacyfiles.org/&quot;&gt;logical fallacies&lt;/a&gt;. Most often the slippery slope (if gays marry, then people will want to marry animals next) or the straw-man argument. I guess my question is, how valid is the medieval logic in our world today? I notice logical fallacies all over the op-ed and in everyday conversation to justify causes. I was beat over the head with the importance of using correct logic, but does it still hold validity? I&apos;ve never seen the TV debates ever call each other out using logic. I&apos;m not trying to ask a far out philosophical question, so more inside. I realize it is both impossible and not expected that everyone have an intimate knowledge of all logical fallacies, but I guess just because of how political the atmosphere has been around here and the media -- it begs the question if I&apos;m the last person to have taken any logic courses. Seriously, has anyone seen someone in the media retort with &quot;that&apos;s argument by consensus, a fallacy&quot; or something similar? Maybe someone with news experience ever reject something based on illogical premises? Or is logic really not all it is said to be?  I understand that most shows like &quot;Crossfire&quot; and columnists like Ann Coulter are mostly theater, but it would seem so easy to just shut them up by responding with simple logic. Why is this not done?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.12144</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:26:55 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>debates</category>
	<category>debating</category>
	<category>logic</category>
	<category>logicalfallacies</category>
	<category>reasoning</category>
	<dc:creator>geoff.</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

