<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with dealingwiththeboss</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/dealingwiththeboss</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'dealingwiththeboss' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:38:41 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:38:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>It&apos;s Lunch Time! For Half the Team?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/108279/Its%2DLunch%2DTime%2DFor%2DHalf%2Dthe%2DTeam</link>	
	<description>How do you deal with a boss that brushes you off when you offer a better solution to a problem when their solution has rather large and obvious holes in it? We&apos;ve gotten a new team leader as of late who&apos;s quite young and inexperienced in the workforce in general. As a result of the front-line staff goofballs screwing up lunch times he&apos;s decided to implement a lunch schedule.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The only problem is that we&apos;re a small call centre department with only a few people and if the first person runs late it means we possibly have half of our team out of the call queue on their lunch break. I noticed this pretty much immediately and devised an alternative table which would result in a maximum of 2 people ever being out on lunch which has no difference in the amount of time people are out on lunch in total.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Me: Here you go. How about this?&lt;br&gt;
Him: It&apos;d be unfair on our new team member and this has a maximum of 3 front line staff in the queue.&lt;br&gt;
Me: Ok then switch him to an earlier lunch and this experienced person to a later lunch? And that schedule can have the potential of only one front-line staff member in the queue.&lt;br&gt;
Him: It wouldn&apos;t kill you, [other experienced staff member] and the mail shift [who doesn&apos;t answer calls until they&apos;ve been waiting 45 seconds] to take some calls.&lt;br&gt;
Me: Yes and we don&apos;t mind taking calls but if you&apos;re relying on our mail shift to answer calls as a last resort you&apos;re damaging the percentage of calls answered in 15 seconds stat.&lt;br&gt;
Him: Well then the first person won&apos;t be late for lunch.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now I&apos;ve spoken to the supervisor who has basically told me &quot;He&apos;s new and under a lot of pressure. Don&apos;t make his life difficult&quot; and I agree to some extent. But I just can&apos;t shake that it&apos;s extremely inefficient, customer service will suffer and that he&apos;s just shooting himself in the foot when it comes time to justify why the stats look so crappy from 12-1.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is there any way that I can get it through to him without rocking the boat?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.108279</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:38:41 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>dealingwiththeboss</category>
	<category>delicatesituation</category>
	<category>inefficiency</category>
	<dc:creator>Talez</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

