<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with dark-energy</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/dark-energy</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'dark-energy' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:33:26 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:33:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Is Dark Matter the new Phlogiston?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/40982/Is%2DDark%2DMatter%2Dthe%2Dnew%2DPhlogiston</link>	
	<description>Is Dark Matter the new Phlogiston?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory&quot;&gt;Phlogiston&lt;/a&gt; is an obsolete 17th Century scientific theory which holds that all flammable materials contain a colourless, weightless matter which is freed in the process of burning.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Matter&quot;&gt;Dark Matter&lt;/a&gt;, and it&apos;s sister force &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Energy&quot;&gt;Dark Energy&lt;/a&gt;, are invisible, omnipresent entities which theory suggests accounts for well over 95% of all the density of the universe. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Will the Dark forces turn out to be nothing more than a 20th century &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Obsolete_scientific_theories&quot;&gt;scientific folley&lt;/a&gt;? My favourite refutation of these Dark forces conerns the existence of higher dimensions of space-time in which alternate universes hang mere nano metres away, excerting a gravitational force which registers on our instruments, but can never be directly accessed. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Which alternate hypothesis draws you? and, In the annals of history, what other &apos;laughing stock theories&apos; could Dark Matter be better compared to?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.40982</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:33:26 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>dark-energy</category>
	<category>dark-matter</category>
	<category>history</category>
	<category>ideas</category>
	<category>physics</category>
	<category>research</category>
	<category>science</category>
	<category>theory</category>
	<category>weird</category>
	<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

