<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with crossreference</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/crossreference</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'crossreference' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:10:10 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:10:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>How to cross-ref two lists in Excel and remove duplicates?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/106795/How%2Dto%2Dcrossref%2Dtwo%2Dlists%2Din%2DExcel%2Dand%2Dremove%2Dduplicates</link>	
	<description>Excel-filter: I&apos;ve got two sheets of data (Firstname, e-mail, lastname, customer #). I&apos;d like to look for and remove any duplicate entries. More inside. I&apos;m updating our customer e-mail newsletter mailing list. No one has done this in about a year. In that year our list of 20,000 names has dwindled to about 15,000. I have that list of 15,000 with bounces and unsubscribes removed. There are a few operations I want to perform to bring the list up to speed:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-People can opt-in to our newsletter when they buy something. This flags their customer entry in the shipping/inventory software but does NOT add them to the mailing list. I pulled a list of everyone who wants to get the e-mail from the last 6 months. I just want to cross-ref this list with the existing list AND with unsubscribes to make sure they didn&apos;t get in another way or have opted out since.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There are a couple of operations that happen in there. All of them come back to the same basic principal- To look at a sheet, or two sheets, and cross ref them looking for duplicates. If there&apos;s a duplicate, delete one of them. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This seems like it should be easy but I&apos;m having a hell of a time. A Google search brings up lots of expensive add-ons but no real advice. Excel-ers of the world: HALP!</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.106795</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:10:10 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>crossreference</category>
	<category>duplicate</category>
	<category>excel</category>
	<dc:creator>GilloD</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Replacing my favorite thesaurus now that it&apos;s more &quot;efficient&quot;?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/90057/Replacing%2Dmy%2Dfavorite%2Dthesaurus%2Dnow%2Dthat%2Dits%2Dmore%2Defficient</link>	
	<description>Recommendations for a good, verbose online thesaurus for wandering through words? thesaurus.com seems to have changed how they serve search results and my working style is screwed. I use thesaurus.com for hours a day. Their overly detailed results, as well as weird and obscure words that aren&apos;t even defined on dictionary.com, were perfect for the way I work (in naming).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I take a few days off, however, and &quot;smart&quot; has 8 results? I used to get pages of entries that were even vaguely related to smart, allowing me to travel interesting pathways and ideas.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve tried Merriam-Webster&apos;s thesaurus and it works the limited and terrible way thesaurus.com does - great for the practical writer, not so great for a word wanderer. onelook.com is great for some applications, but their &quot;limit to a specific concept&quot; is wonky at best. Paper thesauri(?) are fairly useless for this purpose. Word Menu is a little more useful, but limited and slow, as I&apos;m quicker with a mouse than paper.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Are there any tools that work in that wander and get lost way, particularly with a lot of words? Is there some way to get the way-too-prolific results from thesaurus.com again?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.90057</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:03:53 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>concepts</category>
	<category>connected</category>
	<category>crosslinking</category>
	<category>crossreference</category>
	<category>online</category>
	<category>resolved</category>
	<category>thesaurus</category>
	<category>words</category>
	<dc:creator>Gucky</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Lowercase cross-references in Word 2002/XP?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/74179/Lowercase%2Dcrossreferences%2Din%2DWord%2D2002XP</link>	
	<description>How do I get (and keep) lowercase cross-references in Word 2002/XP? The problem is this:&lt;br&gt;
I have a document with figures named something like: Figure 1 - Diagram of insanity&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I want to reference the figure in the text like this, &quot;for my recent mental health, see figure 1&quot;. But if insert a cross-reference the normal way by &lt;i&gt;Cross-reference&lt;/i&gt; on the &lt;i&gt;Insert&lt;/i&gt; menu, I get, &quot;for my recent mental health, see Figure 1&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have solved this with a macro that loops through all cross-references and changes the text to lowercase. The macro looks something like this: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;For Each storyRange In ActiveDocument.StoryRanges&lt;br&gt;
    For Each field In storyRange.Fields&lt;br&gt;
        field.Update&lt;br&gt;
        If field.Type = wdFieldRef And field.Result.Words.Count &lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This works fine and the references stays that way even if I save and close/reopen the document. But now I have noticed that when I try to print the document, all cross-references update and the text returns to the unwanted casing. I have tried toggling the &quot;Update fields&quot; checkbox at &lt;i&gt;Tools&lt;/i&gt; &gt; &lt;i&gt;Options...&lt;/i&gt; &gt; &lt;i&gt;Print&lt;/i&gt; tab &gt; &lt;i&gt;Printing options&lt;/i&gt; but without any change in behavior. Is this a bug(feature)? Should I write the above macro in some other way? And if this is unsolvable (upgrading Word is not an option) is there a macro that replaces all fields with plain text versions? I guess I could resort to saving a copy of the document and execute this macro every time I want to print.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.74179</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:08:18 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>crossreference</category>
	<category>macro</category>
	<category>printing</category>
	<category>word</category>
	<dc:creator>mnsc</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

