<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with compositing</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/compositing</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'compositing' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:28:06 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:28:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Is it still a good time to learn how to Shake ?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/78460/Is%2Dit%2Dstill%2Da%2Dgood%2Dtime%2Dto%2Dlearn%2Dhow%2Dto%2DShake</link>	
	<description>Is learning Shake, the visual effect software, still worth the trouble since Apple dropped it or should i  learn  to use a different package ? I am learning to do compositing and motion graphics. Right now i&apos;m playing with after effects. It&apos;s a very good software but it seems that a lot of vfx houses are using node based interface packages to do their stuff. I&apos;d like to learn to navigate in such a software. &lt;br&gt;
Shake is one of those package and it seems to be the most widely used.&lt;br&gt;
My problem is that, Shake is not supported by Apple anymore. &lt;br&gt;
They&apos;re planning on releasing a new thing next year called Phenomenon. Since it&apos;s an Apple product, nobody knows anything about it yet, it could be a new and improved Shake, it could also be a dumbed down version to appeal to a larger market.&lt;br&gt;
Should i still put the time and money to train on Shake or should i move to another software (Nuke ?) or should i just wait for the release of Phenomenon ?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.78460</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:28:06 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>compositing</category>
	<category>motiongraphics</category>
	<category>shake</category>
	<category>vfx</category>
	<dc:creator>SageLeVoid</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Video Color Space is a mystery to me..</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/38246/Video%2DColor%2DSpace%2Dis%2Da%2Dmystery%2Dto%2Dme</link>	
	<description>I would like to find resources, either in print or online, for learning as much as I can about video color space, specifically where it applies to compositing/keying work. I&apos;m an assistant video editor, principally in avid systems, who&apos;s looking to learn what I can about the nature of color spaces for different video formats.  For instance, I&apos;m told that minidv, having a color space of 4:1:1, is worthless for compositing and keying work.  DVCPRO, having a 4:2:2 color space, I&apos;m told is much better suited to that work, and other formats are even better.  But 4:1:1 doesn&apos;t mean anything to me, technically.  I just remember &quot;4:1:1 is bad for keying, and that&apos;s what minidv has, so minidv is bad for keying.&quot;  I think it&apos;s time for me to understand what those numbers mean, and why certain numbers are better than others, and how they apply to compositing and editing scenarios that I will encounter in my work.  thanks in advance.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.38246</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 15:22:37 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>avid</category>
	<category>colorspace</category>
	<category>compositing</category>
	<category>keying</category>
	<category>minidv</category>
	<category>video</category>
	<dc:creator>shmegegge</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>AE expressions tutorials?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/30460/AE%2Dexpressions%2Dtutorials</link>	
	<description>Anyone know of any good tutorials on expressions in Adobe After Effects?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.30460</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:32:39 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>adobeaftereffects</category>
	<category>animation</category>
	<category>compositing</category>
	<category>expressions</category>
	<category>resolved</category>
	<category>tutorials</category>
	<dc:creator>brundlefly</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Simple matchmoving program?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20306/Simple%2Dmatchmoving%2Dprogram</link>	
	<description>A question for any FX nerds out there: Can you recommend a good &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matchmoving&quot;&gt;matchmoving&lt;/a&gt; program? It has to be for OS X and compatible with (preferably) After Effects or Combustion, and Maya. Ease of use would be a plus, as well. This is my first foray into matchmoving.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20306</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:40:22 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>adobeaftereffects</category>
	<category>aliaswavefrontmaya</category>
	<category>cgi</category>
	<category>compositing</category>
	<category>discreetcombustion</category>
	<category>macosx</category>
	<category>matchmoving</category>
	<category>specialeffects</category>
	<dc:creator>brundlefly</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

