<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with colorprofiles</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/colorprofiles</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'colorprofiles' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 07:35:39 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 07:35:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Monitor Calibration</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20793/Monitor%2DCalibration</link>	
	<description>Monitor Calibration Issues - why is my 225 dollar software making my colors look &lt;i&gt;worse&lt;/i&gt;? Recently I bought a Greta Macbeth Eye One Display 2 monitor calibration/profiling package for use on my CRT monitor.  When I run the software I consistently get results telling me to set my monitor&apos;s brightness at around 75%.  This ends up totally washing out any black at all and making everything look underconstrasty (if that makes any sense - I don&apos;t know what the term for not enough contrast is).  This happens regardless of what I set my target luminance at.  I&apos;ve tried settings of 60, 70, 75, 80 and 100 (recommended for CRT) and in each instance I&apos;m told to set the brightness at 75 or 78%.  Before the system is even done creating the profile I can tell that the monitor is going to be way off because, as I said, the black immediately gets washed out.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So, my question is, am I doing something wrong or is my software screwed?  Here is some more info on my settings:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
White Point:  6500K&lt;br&gt;
Gamma: 2.2&lt;br&gt;
Luminance: as stated above, I&apos;ve triend multiple combos&lt;br&gt;
Contrast: 100 (as determined by the software)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The software has no black point feature.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I work in a mostly dark room.  I&apos;ve used a couple of different test images downloaded from www.chromix.com to look at  my end results.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Any advice is appreciated.  I&apos;ve tried the Fred Miranda forums and the Chromix forums and all were dead ends.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20793</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 07:35:39 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>color</category>
	<category>colormanagement</category>
	<category>colorprofiles</category>
	<category>eyeone</category>
	<category>gretamacbeth</category>
	<category>monitor</category>
	<category>monitorcalibration</category>
	<category>monitorprofiles</category>
	<dc:creator>spicynuts</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

