<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter posts tagged with collectivenouns</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/collectivenouns</link>
      <description>tag posts with collectivenouns</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:38:10 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:38:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Question number 13063</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/13063</link>	
	<description>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/37898&quot;&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;... you&apos;re probably aware that Clear Channel own ...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What is the DEAL with verb/subject disagreement when it comes to corporate entities??  Clear Channel is an IT!  Likewise band names.  I can&apos;t remember how many articles I&apos;ve read with phrases like &quot;Metallica are...&quot; or &quot;Led Zeppelin are...&quot;  Why is this OK in the music business?  I know this is mostly rant-y, but I&apos;m genuinely curious if anyone has, like, the Rolling Stone Style Guide or something.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.13063</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:38:10 -0800</pubDate>

<category>corporate</category>

<category>corporations</category>

<category>names</category>

<category>collectivenouns</category>

<category>collective</category>

<category>plural</category>

<category>groups</category>

	<dc:creator>rkent</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

