<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with celltower</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/celltower</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'celltower' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:34:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:34:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Another reason to hate AT&amp;amp;T</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/71093/Another%2Dreason%2Dto%2Dhate%2DATampT</link>	
	<description>I live in Mesa Arizona. Recently, several churches have had or/are having these &lt;a href=&quot;http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/6716/img4162kw6.jpg&quot;&gt;giant  cross shaped cell towers&lt;/a&gt; installed on church property. I can&apos;t tell you how much this bothers me. First and foremost they are eyesores. When I step out into my front yard and look at what used to be sky, there is a gigantic white cross.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I can&apos;t believe they do not violate some building law about the height a structure can be. I suspect because they are cell towers receive an exception. I spoke with the city and they said that AT&amp;amp;T has gone through the approval process and there is no turning back now. Apparently AT&amp;amp;T leases the space and pays a monthly fee to the church.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It just seems so weird to me, that a corporation is paying for a tax-exempt companies gigantic logo. Shouldn&apos;t they lose their tax-exempt status? I can&apos;t put my finger on it, but it just seems wrong to me.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Has anyone dealt with anything like this? Any suggestions on how to get rid of these or at least stop any more from being erected?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.71093</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:34:40 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>arizona</category>
	<category>ATT</category>
	<category>az</category>
	<category>celltower</category>
	<category>church</category>
	<category>mesa</category>
	<category>superstition</category>
	<dc:creator>Mr_Zero</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Is it safe to live directly underneath a large number of radio and/or cell towers?  </title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54582/Is%2Dit%2Dsafe%2Dto%2Dlive%2Ddirectly%2Dunderneath%2Da%2Dlarge%2Dnumber%2Dof%2Dradio%2Dandor%2Dcell%2Dtowers</link>	
	<description>Is it safe to live directly underneath a large number of radio and/or cell towers?  
My friend wants to move into a building where she would be living on the 20th floor (there are 21 floors) and all along the roof are a LOT of antennas.  (This building is on a hill and is the tallest point anywhere around.)  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Other mefi threads contain good, long debates about this issue but they are all from the perspective of someone living beside, rather than right below, the towers.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don&apos;t know whether the antennas are radio only or radio and cell.  From googling the building address I assume at least some are radio (since one result is a report of a company being cited for moving their radio tower from another building to this building without a permit).  According to cellreception.com, there are no *FCC-registered* cell towers there, but that site says &quot;The FCC does not require every antenna structure to be registered, and the map may or may not list all the towers in the area.&quot;  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks for your thoughts, pro or con, or any advice about researching building addresses to see what antennas are on them!</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.54582</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 03:24:04 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>apartment</category>
	<category>cell</category>
	<category>celltower</category>
	<category>emf</category>
	<category>health</category>
	<category>lease</category>
	<category>radiation</category>
	<category>radio</category>
	<category>radiotower</category>
	<category>residential</category>
	<category>risk</category>
	<dc:creator>lorimer</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Renting property for a cell phone tower?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/47806/Renting%2Dproperty%2Dfor%2Da%2Dcell%2Dphone%2Dtower</link>	
	<description>How can I inform cell phone companies of my willingness to rent to them space for a cell phone tower? I looked through the archives and found quite a bit on the health aspects of nearby cell phone towers, but what I&apos;d still like to know is, how can we even get the cell phone companies to rent from us?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I mean, if I have property that I&apos;m willing to rent out to them, how do I let them know about it?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Do I have to go to each company individually (and how would I go about that?) or are there some central sources or outside contractors who assist with this process?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.47806</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:49:06 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>Cell</category>
	<category>cellphone</category>
	<category>cellphonetower</category>
	<category>celltower</category>
	<category>phone</category>
	<category>propety</category>
	<category>rent</category>
	<category>tower</category>
	<dc:creator>stst399</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

