<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with caloriesburned</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/caloriesburned</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'caloriesburned' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:13:24 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:13:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Is ice skating really that good an exercise for the beginner?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/237576/Is%2Dice%2Dskating%2Dreally%2Dthat%2Dgood%2Dan%2Dexercise%2Dfor%2Dthe%2Dbeginner</link>	
	<description>Everything I am reading about ice skating raves about what a wonderful workout it is and how you will develop a core-o&apos;steel and burn no end of calories! How true is that, really, for the beginner? I am teaching myself ice skating from, essentially, absolute beginner level. I am just getting to the end of chapter four of the book I am using, which teaches forward stroking and a preparation for skating backwards. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Up until now I have been teaching myself to stop, and to glide forward on one foot on the flat of the blade. So until yesterday, all of my workouts consisted of: stroke, stroke, stroke, stroke, stop. Stroke, stroke, stroke, stroke, glide. For an hour or more.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yesterday I reached the dizzying heights of proper forward stroking. Yes, seven whole minutes without stopping! I was on the ice for almost an hour and a half. It was not strenuous at all. I did not break a sweat. I did not suck wind. My ankles, calves and glutes do not ache and my abs wax not tense upon me. I didn&apos;t check my heart rate but I assume it was bobbling along at resting pace.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Basically I don&apos;t believe that what I did amounts to a workout. In terms of effort, it was easier than walking. It&apos;s supposed to be! That&apos;s what skates are for, to propel you with effortless speed along those frozen canals!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Or am I wrong? Is it possible that I could do this activity for 90 minutes, not feel a thing, and still call it a workout? Why? I don&apos;t get it.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2013:site.237576</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:13:24 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>abs</category>
	<category>calories</category>
	<category>caloriesburned</category>
	<category>calves</category>
	<category>core</category>
	<category>effort</category>
	<category>figureskating</category>
	<category>glutes</category>
	<category>iceskating</category>
	<category>impact</category>
	<category>workout</category>
	<dc:creator>tel3path</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Heart Rate Monitors and Calculating Calories</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/146424/Heart%2DRate%2DMonitors%2Dand%2DCalculating%2DCalories</link>	
	<description>I&apos;ve been working hard on my eating habits in order to lose weight; now I need to start exercising.  What&apos;s the best way to calculate how many calories I&apos;m burning when I do cardio? I&apos;m thinking about purchasing a heart rate monitor with GPS (or the ability to add GPS later), but I&apos;m uncertain as to whether that&apos;s the best option.  If it matters, I&apos;m planning on starting by using elliptical and treadmill machines at the gym.  This fall, after I get in a shape that is slightly less round and the weather gets cooler, I&apos;m going to start training for a half marathon outside.  It would seem that GPS would come in handy at this piont.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Heart rate monitor or something else?  Please explain your answer and offer product recommendations!</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2010:site.146424</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:45:57 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>caloriesburned</category>
	<category>exercise</category>
	<category>heartrate</category>
	<category>heartratemonitor</category>
	<dc:creator>Aleen</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Exercise, heart rate, &amp;amp; calories burned</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/72516/Exercise%2Dheart%2Drate%2Dand%2Dcalories%2Dburned</link>	
	<description>Questions about exercise, heart rate, and estimating calories burned. Forgive the length, but I&apos;m trying to be as detailed as possible.  &lt;br&gt;
Background:&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve lost over 100 lbs in the past couple of years by counting calories and exercising.  I stopped doing both of those things for a few months after hitting a plateau and then going through a particularly stressful period, leading me to gain back a few pounds.  I&apos;ve been back on track for the last month and seem to be dropping a couple of pounds a week.&lt;br&gt;
Current Routine:&lt;br&gt;
I eat about 1,200 calories a day, which has been my calorie goal since I started losing weight. I eat small meals throughout the day and am not hungry -- I think I could limit myself to 1,000 calories a day fairly easily, but I&apos;m not sure if that&apos;s wise.  I do 45 minutes of cardio a day on the elliptical and lift weights 3 times a week.  Every other day, I do intervals to go between 60% and 85% of my estimated max heart rate based on calculators that factor in age and resting heart rate. I try to keep my heart rate in the 80-85% range on non-interval days.  I have a heart rate monitor that uses my age, gender, height, weight and resting heart rate to estimate the number of calories burned.  I know it&apos;s just an estimate.&lt;br&gt;
Question:&lt;br&gt;
I find that I&apos;m much more likely to work out if I do so in the mornings, as soon as I get up.  There&apos;s a gym in my condo, so I probably am on the machine within 15 minutes of getting out of bed.  I&apos;m not hungry then, and usually don&apos;t eat breakfast until around 2 hours after my workout.  I fill a bottle of water before I work out, but usually don&apos;t drink any until a few minutes into my workout.  My heart rate in the morning goes up much faster working at a much lower intensity than it does when I work out in the evenings.  When I do work out in the evenings, I have to increase the resistance and really push myself to keep my heart rate above 80% of my max.  In the mornings, I wonder if it&apos;s getting too high -- it seems like I have to hold myself back to keep it around 85%.  Either way, my average heart rate is almost the same, so am I burning the same number of calories?  How long before my workout would I have to eat or drink to see it make any difference?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.72516</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:31:44 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>caloriesburned</category>
	<category>exercise</category>
	<category>heartrate</category>
	<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

