<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with bulkemail</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/bulkemail</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'bulkemail' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:55:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:55:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Can I safely block port 25 on my server?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/74716/Can%2DI%2Dsafely%2Dblock%2Dport%2D25%2Don%2Dmy%2Dserver</link>	
	<description>Can I block port 25 or not? I&apos;m working on the firewall of a public facing webserver at the moment, and want to block TCP port 25 (SMTP) to incoming traffic as I&apos;m seeing many connections that I just don&apos;t want to accept. The server does not handle any incoming email so this would usually be a no-brainer, just block and forget about it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
However, the server is sending around 25000 emails to a distribution list, two or three times a week. I am sure that AOL, or some other big email providers will block emails coming from servers that do not have port 25 open.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don&apos;t want to just block it to test this and have a load of failed emails to deal with. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Do you know if I need to leave port 25 open or not?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.74716</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:55:34 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>bulkemail</category>
	<category>notspambeforeyouask</category>
	<category>port25</category>
	<category>server</category>
	<category>smtp</category>
	<dc:creator>ajbattrick</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Sending E-mail to a group</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/36872/Sending%2DEmail%2Dto%2Da%2Dgroup</link>	
	<description>What&apos;s a good Windows-based program for sending daily blind carbon copy E-mails to a small group of people (like 10 or 20)? The easy solution is that I could just paste all the recipients in PocoMail (the client I use) but I&apos;m worried about, in some morning brain fog, accidentally pasting them all in the cc: rather than bcc: field and spilling all their identities (client confidentiality is important).  So I want this to be automated.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dreamhost (which I use) has an announcements list feature, but what they don&apos;t tell you is that messages go into a queue.  &lt;i&gt;Your message to ---- has been successfully sent to our announcement list queue.  It will be received by the list members within an hour of when you scheduled it!&lt;/i&gt;  Indeed the messages take 10+ minutes to get sent.  No dice.  My E-mails are time-sensitive.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It seems that there has GOT to be a simple program that simply looks at a flatfile of E-mail addresses and sends text to each user.  Heck, I&apos;d be glad to batch script this if there was a simple EXE out there for sending E-mail that didn&apos;t require compilation and a mess of third-party libraries.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Infacta GroupMail is one solution but it&apos;s way overkill.  Majordomo is also overkill -- I can&apos;t deal with a lot of configuration and limited portability.  It doesn&apos;t have to be this complicated.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.36872</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:37:04 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>bulkemail</category>
	<category>massemail</category>
	<category>program</category>
	<dc:creator>rolypolyman</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>I&apos;m not a spammer, I swear!</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33903/Im%2Dnot%2Da%2Dspammer%2DI%2Dswear</link>	
	<description>Legitimate bulk emailing:  My department has a need to send out surveys to a large number of former students.  The catch is that the reply-to: fields must be altered, so that the responses go to the deans (or whoever is designated to read them) of their respective departments... We are looking for a inexpensive, even free, solution to make this happen.  They first tried to have someone in the office code up a bulk e-mailer, but he just moved out of town before he was finished.  I&apos;m going to look at the code this afternoon and see if I can finish it, but I&apos;ve never really done anything fancy with e-mail before.  They also looked at using the Micro$oft mail merge facilities, but it seems there is no way to change the reply-to: field.  Of course, only one address should show up in the to: field.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This may happen at most once a year, so we really don&apos;t want to sink very much money into it.  Any suggestions?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33903</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>bulkemail</category>
	<category>email</category>
	<dc:creator>Roger Dodger</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Weekly Emails</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14446/Weekly%2DEmails</link>	
	<description>I&apos;m looking for a way to send a weekly email to a list of members of a nonprofit organization I work for. (+) What I want to be able to do is be able to send a single message from my home office to an email address on my office server (NT server, Microsoft Exchange), and have the server in turn send it out to a text list of email addresses. Basically a glorified .forward file.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don&#8217;t need anything fancy, like many of the list processing software packages I&#8217;ve seen &#8211; recipients don&#8217;t need to be able to change settings to their accounts or anything like that. Being able to get a single report of bounced emails would be nice, but not necessary.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Oh, and since our server is an ancient, steam-driven machine, it would be nice if it sent out the messages in batches rather than all at once, so that everyone&#8217;s access to the Internet didn&#8217;t basically shut down for an hour while it the newsletter was being sent.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We&#8217;ve just been using the BCC: field for a long time, but with 3000+ addresses, that&#8217;s getting unwieldy.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14446</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:33:35 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>automatedemail</category>
	<category>bulkemail</category>
	<category>email</category>
	<category>groupemail</category>
	<dc:creator>Framer</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Maximizing delivery of bulk e-mails for an e-mail newsletter?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/10142/Maximizing%2Ddelivery%2Dof%2Dbulk%2Demails%2Dfor%2Dan%2Demail%2Dnewsletter</link>	
	<description>I&apos;m looking to help a client set up a totally legitimate outbound e-mail newsletter (all opt-in, for a known audience, etc.), and I&apos;m trying to help them minimize bouncebacks on known addresses. Any experience with maximizing delivery of bulk e-mails? [more inside, and &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt;, I don&apos;t want to spam anyone] Let me just reiterate a couple of points up front&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1) This is for newsletter/announcement mailings to a group of recipients who have all given their e-mail addresses, &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; given explicit permission to mail them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2) The issue is not bounce back on bad/out-of-date e-mail addresses. We&apos;re putting separate processes in place to deal with those.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The main problem is that they&apos;ve used other, well-established mailing-list service providers, and gotten bounce-back rates of up to 40%, because of blacklists, outbound SMTP thresholds, and all the other infrastructure anti-spam hurdles that have cropped up in the past few years. They&apos;ve now gone back on the other end of the spectrum so far that they&apos;re actually using an outdated version of &quot;majordomo&quot;, and pasting in e-mail addresses one at a time. Not only is that a huge waste of time, but they have no tracking, etc. On the other hand, because it sends out the mails one at a time, they all seem to pretty much get through.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here&apos;s what I&apos;m looking for--a legitimate way of sending out several thousand e-mails (not all at once, but at least within a 24 hours period) in a way that won&apos;t either flip out their little local ISP, or send half the mails down a black hole. I think I&apos;ve found a pretty good list management client, that&apos;s actually got a lot of flexibility in how it can send out the mails, but I want to tap into some previous experience, if I can, on setting this up. Any ideas?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.10142</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:25:42 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>bulkemail</category>
	<category>email</category>
	<category>newsletters</category>
	<dc:creator>LairBob</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>What&apos;s the best software for bulk email?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/6369/Whats%2Dthe%2Dbest%2Dsoftware%2Dfor%2Dbulk%2Demail</link>	
	<description>A client wants to send bulk email. What&apos;s the best software? Is there a way to get address lists of people who might be interested in the product (shrink film), or do you just buy lists wholesale somewhere? Will I be lost to the Dark Side and land in the spammer&apos;s circle of hell if I set this up for them?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.6369</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:08:57 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>bulkemail</category>
	<category>bulkmail</category>
	<category>email</category>
	<category>software</category>
	<category>spam</category>
	<category>spammer</category>
	<dc:creator>muckster</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

