<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with briefs</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/briefs</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'briefs' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:43:22 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:43:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Is the cultural dislike a briefs a factor important enough to make it worth my while to switch to boxers?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/101504/Is%2Dthe%2Dcultural%2Ddislike%2Da%2Dbriefs%2Da%2Dfactor%2Dimportant%2Denough%2Dto%2Dmake%2Dit%2Dworth%2Dmy%2Dwhile%2Dto%2Dswitch%2Dto%2Dboxers</link>	
	<description>I am in my late twenties and like wearing briefs, though this is frowned upon.  Is the cultural dislike of briefs a factor important enough to make it worth my while to switch to boxers? I tried wearing boxers but hated hated the loose sensation. Should I get used to the discomfort for the sake of respectability? (It seems to me that wearing boxers vs. briefs is the equivalent of having a good haircut vs. a bad one. Appearance does matter, though of course I do value comfort as well. That&apos;s why this is a dilemma for me.) P.S: I did receive negative comments about wearing briefs and many times at that.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.101504</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:43:22 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>apparel</category>
	<category>appearance</category>
	<category>boxers</category>
	<category>briefs</category>
	<category>comfort</category>
	<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Why is the opening at the front of men&apos;s briefs still there if it&apos;s rarely used?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/40759/Why%2Dis%2Dthe%2Dopening%2Dat%2Dthe%2Dfront%2Dof%2Dmens%2Dbriefs%2Dstill%2Dthere%2Dif%2Dits%2Drarely%2Dused</link>	
	<description>UnderpantsFilter: What is the opening at the front of briefs (and boxer breifs) for?  Okay, I know what it&apos;s for, but does anyone actually use it?  It seems far more trouble to manipulate than pulling the front of your pants down four inches.  If no one uses it, why is it still there?  It seems to add extra fabric and stitching that cost-reductionism would have eliminated long ago.  Is it simple industry momentum?  Does it add something to the comfort I don&apos;t see?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.40759</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:02:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>boxerbriefs</category>
	<category>briefs</category>
	<category>underpants</category>
	<category>underwear</category>
	<dc:creator>Plutor</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Underwear or none-derwear?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/11352/Underwear%2Dor%2Dnonederwear</link>	
	<description>No, seriously:  What are the pros and cons of wearing underwear vs &quot;going commando&quot;?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.11352</guid>
	<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 08:23:43 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>boxers</category>
	<category>briefs</category>
	<category>commando</category>
	<category>lingerie</category>
	<category>panties</category>
	<category>pants</category>
	<category>underpants</category>
	<category>underwear</category>
	<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

