<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with brandx</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/brandx</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'brandx' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:40:11 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:40:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Experts say Brand X is now significantly less distinguishable from name brands!</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/54294/Experts%2Dsay%2DBrand%2DX%2Dis%2Dnow%2Dsignificantly%2Dless%2Ddistinguishable%2Dfrom%2Dname%2Dbrands</link>	
	<description>For which products or services is it worth it to buy name brand instead of generic brand? When will brand X do just as well, or even better?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.54294</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:40:11 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>brand</category>
	<category>branding</category>
	<category>brands</category>
	<category>brandx</category>
	<category>namebrand</category>
	<category>pricequality</category>
	<category>products</category>
	<category>quality</category>
	<category>value</category>
	<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

