<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with because</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/because</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'because' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:20:53 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:20:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Yes, I&apos;m.</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/91470/Yes%2DIm</link>	
	<description>Vagaries of the English Language, part &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;:  I need to tell my boss why the contraction &quot;I&apos;m&quot; cannot stand alone as a sentence.  For example, &quot;Yes, I am&quot; is okay.  &quot;Yes, I&apos;m&quot; is not.  I haven&apos;t been able to find any good logic for this case or that works for the different contractions in general (&quot;don&apos;t&quot; can also stand alone, &quot;I&apos;d&quot; and &quot;I&apos;ve&quot; cannot).  Given this is about languages, and particularly English, &quot;just because&quot; is, alas, potentially the best answer.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.91470</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:20:53 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>because</category>
	<category>contractions</category>
	<category>english</category>
	<category>grammar</category>
	<category>sentence</category>
	<dc:creator>whatzit</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

