<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with apostrophes</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/apostrophes</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'apostrophes' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:57:56 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:57:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Apostrophe or no?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/16016/Apostrophe%2Dor%2Dno</link>	
	<description>In the phrase &quot;I&apos;m going to milk this for all it&apos;s worth,&quot; which is it? Its or it&apos;s? (I.e., apostrophe or no apostrophe?) A case could be made for either: &quot;for all that it is worth,&quot; or &quot;for all the worth that it possesses.&quot; This has been bugging me for months. I lean toward an apostrophe, but I look to MeFi for consensus, or at least stimulating discussion. (&lt;b&gt;Please note&lt;/b&gt;, this is &lt;b&gt;not the same&lt;/b&gt; as &quot;for what it&apos;s worth,&quot; which definitely gets an apostrophe.)</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.16016</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:57:56 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>apostrophes</category>
	<dc:creator>goatdog</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

