<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with a350</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/a350</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with 'a350' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:17:08 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:17:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Too many cameras! So many features! Too much choice! Arrrgggrhhhh!</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/103090/Too%2Dmany%2Dcameras%2DSo%2Dmany%2Dfeatures%2DToo%2Dmuch%2Dchoice%2DArrrgggrhhhh</link>	
	<description>Calling all Mefi photographers. Help me choose my entry level DSLR. I just went to my local camera store to buy a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/ProductDetail.page?pid=25438&quot;&gt;Nikon D60&lt;/a&gt; but I made the mistake of asking the guy in the store if there were any other similarly priced ones he recommended. He immediately recommended the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sony.co.uk/product/dss-digital-slr/dslr-a350&quot;&gt;Sony a350&lt;/a&gt;. This totally threw me I had made up my mind that I wanted a D60 no question! But the Sony A350 has a host of extra features I wasn&apos;t expecting to find with the budget I have. Here are the pros and cons of each model as I see them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1) Glass - Nikon lenses are generally better than Sony right? But Sony bought Minolta so I can use old Minolta lenses if I want. I&apos;ve also heard that Carl Zeiss makes all Sony lenses! Is that true?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2) Live view - The Nikon doesn&apos;t have it, but the Sony does. And the display is movable for shooting from the waist or from over the head! This is drawing me to the Sony.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
3) Vibration reduction - The Nikon uses VR in the lens. But the Sony&apos;s VR is in the body. Technically I should be able to get vibration reduction with any lens I use in the Sony. But i would have to buy specific VR lenses from Nikon&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
4) Autofocus - I think the Nikon&apos;s AF isnt back compatible with old lenses. But I&apos;m not sure about this.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now to top it off I&apos;ve started looking at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canon.co.uk/for_home/product_finder/cameras/digital_slr/EOS_400D/index.asp&quot;&gt;Cannon EOS 400D / XTi &lt;/a&gt;too! I&apos;m a beginner photographer so I&apos;m looking for a camera that will help me learn the nuances of photography. My budget is &#xa3;500 ish give or take. I also plan to buy a longer lens before Christmas as I am hoping to spend new year in The Maasai Mara.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m torn and conflicted here! A decision that once was so easy has become unbelievably difficult! I would appreciate any advice or testimonies that you can provide.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks in advance.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.103090</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:17:08 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>400D-XTI</category>
	<category>a350</category>
	<category>Cannon</category>
	<category>D60</category>
	<category>DSLR</category>
	<category>EOS</category>
	<category>Nikon</category>
	<category>Photography</category>
	<category>Resolved</category>
	<category>Sony</category>
	<dc:creator>gergtreble</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

