<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with 32-bit</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/32-bit</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with '32-bit' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:30:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:30:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>How is physical memory recognized by a 32-bit OS running on 64-bit hardware?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/62604/How%2Dis%2Dphysical%2Dmemory%2Drecognized%2Dby%2Da%2D32bit%2DOS%2Drunning%2Don%2D64bit%2Dhardware</link>	
	<description>How is physical memory recognized by a 32-bit OS running on 64-bit hardware? (This was originally a &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/61869/64bit-n00b-doesnt-want-to-be-a-b00b#941893&quot;&gt;comment on an older thread&lt;/a&gt;, but it went unanswered, so I&apos;m asking a fresh question.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Can someone explain how the murky 4GB barrier works in 32-bit Windows? To be more clear - currently, on a 32-bit CPU with a 32-bit OS, if you put 4GB of RAM in the machine, it doesn&apos;t recognize more than about 3.5GB because some is reserved by the PCI bus, and of that RAM, you can only allocate 2GB to any given process because the kernel reserves a bunch. What about on a 64-bit CPU (still with 32-bit Windows)? If you put 8GB into the machine, do you get 3.5GB for the kernel, 512M for the PCI bus, and a separately addressable 4GB physical RAM that can be allocated to a process? What happens if you have exactly 4GB of RAM? Does it behave just like a 32-bit OS on a 32-bit CPU?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.62604</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:30:44 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>32-bit</category>
	<category>64-bit</category>
	<category>CPU</category>
	<category>memory</category>
	<category>OS</category>
	<category>RAM</category>
	<dc:creator>Caviar</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>64-bit n00b, doesn&apos;t want to be a b00b.</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/61869/64bit%2Dn00b%2Ddoesnt%2Dwant%2Dto%2Dbe%2Da%2Db00b</link>	
	<description>Getting new laptop with x64 processor...should I get 32-bit Vista, or 64-bit?  Does it matter?  How about 64-bit XP?
New laptop purchase candidate has AMDx64 processor.&lt;br&gt;
But my only knowledge of 64-bit computing is that it seems to provoke headaches.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&#8217;ve gone through the 64-bit threads here, but many of them are a year or more old, so I don&#8217;t know if the situation has improved..  I wouldn&#8217;t bother asking, but considering that my last 3 computer purchases were basically free (recycling &#8211;No! Upgrading!- older machines to Linux), I&#8217;m  fretting over spending $$$ on the wrong thing.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It&#8217;s just a &#8216;very-portable&#8217; home/biz laptop that&#8217;s maxed out at 2gb RAM.  So no bonuses for 64-bit&#8217;s higher RAM ceiling.  Not for gaming, no overclocked CAD/video editing workstation, etc.  Simply wanted a small notebook with Vista.  It just so happened that the form factor I liked comes with a 64-bit processor.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Okay, you early adopters who might have gone through this already, a couple questions:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1)  This will be my first Vista machine AND my first x64 processor.  Will I have more or less problems with running a 64-bit OS on a 64 bit processor than I would running 32-bit version of the same OS on the same machine? Would I even notice any gain from x64, given that I&#8217;m only on 2gb RAM anyway? Does the x86 emulation or whatever lets it run in 32-bit mode suck and slow things down?  Trying to pick which flavor of Vista will run smoother&#8230;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2)  I ask because I would like to get Vista Ultimate, but the OEM for this only offers it in 64-bit, even though their Premium &amp;amp; Business offerings are 32-bit.  I need to join a domain, so it&#8217;s Business at the least; but I am also interested in the Media Center stuff in Ultimate.  If I&#8217;m stuck with a crap 64-bit Ultimate or a functioning 32-bit Business, I&#8217;m going to have to go with Business.  No difference?  Ultimate.  Who owns either or both and can tell me about it?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
3)  Sort of eliminating the above question; if anyone has an OEM Vista Ultimate DVD: did it come with both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions on it, like I hear that the retail version does?  If so, then we&#8217;re done: I&#8217;ll have the option to try both. for what works better.  If not, repeat question 1.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
4)  I&#8217;m going to set up this machine with an XP partition to boot from for the times when Vista isn&#8217;t my friend.  And I just so happen to have an unused XP Pro 64bit install package lying around doing nothing but being shrinkwrapped &amp;amp; legit.  (I ended up with this as a gift from someone who tried XPx64 on a few machines in 2005 and gave up in tears.) &#8220;Why not save a couple hundred dollars and use it instead of buying XP again&#8221;, I say to myself &#8220;- they must have improved it since it came out&#8221;.  But maybe it still sucks?  Is XP x64 going to give me a whole other set of headaches, making it worth going out and buying a retail XP 32-bit copy for my dual-booting to safety needs?  Expensive!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
5)  Bonus Question:  Who was Casper the Ghost before he died?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks for all your help, everybuggy.</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2007:site.61869</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 09:48:32 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>32-bit</category>
	<category>64-bit</category>
	<category>AMD</category>
	<category>Vista</category>
	<category>x64</category>
	<category>XPx64</category>
	<dc:creator>bartleby</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

