<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	  <title>Ask MetaFilter questions tagged with 21grams</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/tags/21grams</link>
      <description>Questions tagged with '21grams' at Ask MetaFilter.</description>
	  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:09:57 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:09:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>

      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>	  
	<item>
	<title>Is time on my side?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/4527/Is%2Dtime%2Don%2Dmy%2Dside</link>	
	<description>Roger Ebert&apos;s review of 21 Grams (which I&apos;m about to see) contains the following sentence: &quot;Even though modern physics tells that time does not move from the past through the present into the future, entertaining that delusion is how we make sense of our perceptions.&quot;  This kind of surprised me because I was under the impression that time DID move from the past through the present and into the future.  Can someone explain how / why it doesn&apos;t?</description>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.4527</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:09:57 -0800</pubDate>
	<category>21grams</category>
	<category>movie</category>
	<category>theoryoftime</category>
	<category>time</category>
	<dc:creator>adrober</dc:creator>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>

