[Background: I believe most people make moral decisions based on heuristics that they have picked up from their cultural environment. There's a paper showing why this is not always such a good idea
here. I am also somewhat sceptical of most ethical theories. In my experience, with practical problems in a complex world, you can justify almost anything by picking a sympathetic logical frame for the issue. So rather than discarding heuristics, I'd like to know what a
good heuristic might be.]
At a very simple level:
question authority might be a useful moral heuristic. But I am not so much looking for aphorisms as reports of work that examines the whole approach (ie using heuristics in a positive way to solve ethical problems). Even a suitable google phrase might be useful (I tried "applied ethics", for example, but that is more concerned with applying the kind of "first principles" approach that I have little faith in).
Alternatively, if this is hopelessly naive and uninformed, is there an introduction to ethics I should be reading that addresses the issues of complexity and incomplete information?
Thanks.
Review - Science and Ethics
Review - Morality in a Natural World - Ethics
Review - The Ethics Toolkit - Ethics A Compendium of Ethical Concepts and Methods
Review - The Ethics of Bioethics - Ethics Mapping the Moral Landscape
Review - Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry - Ethics
Brain Mapping, Ethics, Law and Cognitive Liberty
Heuristic Research: A New Perspective on Ethics and Problems in Adult Education Research.
posted by psyche7 at 10:40 AM on August 3, 2008