<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Is TV real?!?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/96717/Is-TV-real/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Is TV real?!?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:25:57 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:25:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Is TV real?!?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/96717/Is-TV-real</link>	
		<description>What are other sites that tell me about the &quot;realness&quot; of television shows? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I love sites that analyze the real-world consequences or accuracy of television shows. I&apos;ve found sites about the litigation problems &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hrheroblogs.com/thatswhatshesaid/&quot;&gt;Michael Scott would face&lt;/a&gt; on The Office, and I&apos;ve read about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politedissent.com/house_pd.html&quot;&gt;how shoddy the medical facts&lt;/a&gt; are on House. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What are some other sites that analyze television shows in this way? Specifically, I&apos;d like to read an expert&apos;s analysis of The Closer, but really anything similar would be interesting. The key is they have to follow through specific episodes and tell me what&apos;s legit and what&apos;s total fiction.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As a small aside- if you saw the new episode of The Closer on Monday, was their disgusting method of getting fingerprints based on any part of reality? Thanks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.96717</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:54:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>parkerjackson</dc:creator>
		
			<category>television</category>
		
			<category>analysis</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: mmascolino</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/96717/Is-TV-real#1410166</link>	
		<description>Not a site exactly, but there are a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nitcentral.com/&quot;&gt;series of books&lt;/a&gt; that cover assorted Star Trek and X-Files series that do some of this as well as point out production flaws (continuity mistakes, visible microphones, etc.).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.96717-1410166</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:25:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmascolino</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: breaks the guidelines?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/96717/Is-TV-real#1410193</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/what-do-real-thugs-think-of-the-wire/&quot;&gt; What Do Real Thugs Think of &lt;cite&gt;The Wire&lt;/cite&gt;?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.96717-1410193</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:53:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>breaks the guidelines?</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Captain_Science</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/96717/Is-TV-real#1410238</link>	
		<description>Re: Monday&apos;s The Closer it&apos;s similar to any of the forensic shows on TV these days....real in a sense that it can be done but isn&apos;t done nearly as often as they show on TV. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, I don&apos;t know anyone who would go near something like that without gloves in this day and age.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.96717-1410238</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:48:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Captain_Science</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: goo</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/96717/Is-TV-real#1410240</link>	
		<description>And from the comments of breakstheguidelines? link, &lt;a href=&quot;http://notsneaky.blogspot.com/2007/05/economics-of-wire.html&quot;&gt;The Economics of The Wire&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.96717-1410240</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:49:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>goo</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ultraultraboomerang</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/96717/Is-TV-real#1410262</link>	
		<description>Regarding your specific question, I&apos;ve seen that icky/awesome fingerprinting technique on documentary series like Forensic Files.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.96717-1410262</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:07:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ultraultraboomerang</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: fishfucker</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/96717/Is-TV-real#1410328</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m almost 100% sure you and everyone else who reads this has heard of it, but in a similar vein (ie, not television) is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intuitor.com/moviephysics/&quot;&gt;Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics&lt;/a&gt;, which grades films on their adherence to the laws of physics. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;great question!&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.96717-1410328</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:59:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fishfucker</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
