Help me find a research-based list of substances and /or ingredients that are or could be harmful to children in amounts normally found in households.
I've noticed a willingness on the part of new parents and parents-to-be to believe all kinds of things regarding toxic household products. And with good reason - regulatory agencies don't seem to be doing such a great job keeping known toxins out of food, toys, etc. But one could drive oneself crazy completely avoiding the number of poorly-studied toxins in the environment. (BTW: I am aware of federal regulations on certain chemicals, but am
more concerned about low-level exposure at levels usually found in household materials.)
So I'm looking for some sort of research-based list of toxins (including potential toxins). The list should point to the original studies that show how toxic the substance is, how it might affect humans, how it gets into your system, etc. Ideally, it would be nice to have a list that divides substances up into categories in a similar way to the Monterey Bay Aquarium's
Seafood Watch list, with one category for substances found at acutely toxic levels in the home (bleach, pesticides, etc.), another category for toxins normally found in low levels in households but accumulated throughout one's lifetime, and maybe another for "safer alternatives." It would also be nice to have substances categorized by how clear the danger is - is it well-documented (e.g. lead), hypothesized based on similar substances, etc. The most important parts of what I'm looking for, though, are references to primary scientific studies - hopefully peer-reviewed or government pubs.
If no such list exists, I'm willing to start putting one together if there's somewhere I can get a hold of a big chunk of this info. I'd also need a pointer toward where the studies are usually published. I am an environmental scientist (loosely classified, not a toxicologist or a chemist), and have access to a very good library. Any pointers to individual references (primary studies or reviews) would be very welcome.
More generally, there have been studies on this topic. The abstract of the linked study:
posted by jedicus at 3:05 PM on July 14, 2008