<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Can an email group be a chat group for some, and an announce-only group for others?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/95014/Can-an-email-group-be-a-chat-group-for-some-and-an-announceonly-group-for-others/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Can an email group be a chat group for some, and an announce-only group for others?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:08:43 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:08:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Can an email group be a chat group for some, and an announce-only group for others?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/95014/Can-an-email-group-be-a-chat-group-for-some-and-an-announceonly-group-for-others</link>	
		<description>Is there a way to make an email list announce-only for some recipients and unmoderated for others? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Lots of things in my life involve organizing email lists where I occasionally send announcements to small groups of subscribers (10-75 people, say).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My guess is that some people on these lists would like to be able to reply and chat with other recipients, and some people would like to just get the announcements.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I wonder if there&apos;s some way to arrange this? I can see how a service like google groups could offer this. As a group subscriber, you could choose to receive only messages from the moderator, or you could choose to receive all messages sent to the list address. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Do you know if there&apos;s a way to do this? A mailing-group service that supports this option? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don&apos;t think having separate &quot;announce&quot; and &quot;chat&quot; lists will do what I want. It seems like too much thinking. I&apos;d like people to just be able to reply to an announcement, and know that their reply will only go to people who want to get it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.95014</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:11:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ManInSuit</dc:creator>
		
			<category>email</category>
		
			<category>group</category>
		
			<category>moderated</category>
		
			<category>announce</category>
		
			<category>chat</category>
		
			<category>options</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: rhizome</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/95014/Can-an-email-group-be-a-chat-group-for-some-and-an-announceonly-group-for-others#1387567</link>	
		<description>Why not? If they were just two different lists you could just send your initial email to the two addresses and be done with it. I mean, I&apos;m sure there are services that would provide this for you, but if you&apos;re just setting up some standard lists I&apos;d just go with the separation of purposes. Put a header at the bottom of each with a link to switch their subscription over to the other kind.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On a second reading, maybe you&apos;re thinking that the mere act of replying would put each person in &quot;conversation&quot; mode? That way lies complication for sure.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.95014-1387567</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:08:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhizome</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: SirStan</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/95014/Can-an-email-group-be-a-chat-group-for-some-and-an-announceonly-group-for-others#1387598</link>	
		<description>I do this with mailman.  Just set all new users to moderate (theres a checkbox for it).  Unmoderate those who apply.  Bam -- announce only list with unmoderated access.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.95014-1387598</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:49:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SirStan</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: SirStan</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/95014/Can-an-email-group-be-a-chat-group-for-some-and-an-announceonly-group-for-others#1387600</link>	
		<description>Ah -- I actually read your entire question. Mailman allows a &quot;reply to&quot; address.  You could make list a&apos;s reply to be list d.  People can sign up for list a (announce) or list d (discuss).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So..&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
list-a@myproject.com -- reply-to: list-d@myproject.com&lt;br&gt;
list-d@myproject.com -- reply-to: &lt;default&gt; .. list-d@myproject.com&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now when someone replies to list-a, their email client should address the email to &apos;list-d&apos;.&lt;/default&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.95014-1387600</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:51:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SirStan</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jacquilynne</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/95014/Can-an-email-group-be-a-chat-group-for-some-and-an-announceonly-group-for-others#1387870</link>	
		<description>You can do this with Yahoo Groups. Some people can choose to receive only administrator announcements (ie, the stuff you send) and other people can choose to receive all messages.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.95014-1387870</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:34:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jacquilynne</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ManInSuit</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/95014/Can-an-email-group-be-a-chat-group-for-some-and-an-announceonly-group-for-others#1388463</link>	
		<description>Thanks!!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
jacquilynne - I looked a bunch at whether this could be done w. google groups (I don&apos;t think it can), but, dumbly, didn&apos;t look at yahoo groups.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
SirStan - Oh! That&apos;s smart. I don&apos;t know if I have access to mailman anywhere, but I guess that ingenious strategy would work w. any mailing list that lets you specify a reply-to address...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.95014-1388463</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:45:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ManInSuit</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
