One of the most common causes of falsely high breathalyzer readings is the existence of mouth alcohol. In analyzing a subject's breath sample, the breathalyzer's internal computer is making the assumption that the alcohol in the breath sample came from alveolar air—that is, air exhaled from deep within the lungs.As for this device... I doubt it would be very effective, because alcohol is not nearly as potent as most drugs that are usually used through inhalation.
[...] certain active compounds in garlic that cannot be digested are passed on to the blood and excreted via the skin and lungs.
"Thousands of years ago, when men and women took that first drink, their lungs, nasal passage and bronchial tubes had alcohol passing through them." -- um, no, otherwise they would die from drowning.
"That’s why you’ve probably heard: “You smell like you've been drinking again” or “Please exhale in this breathalyzer.”" -- you smell like you've been drinking because you have alcohol breath on your tongue, not in your lungs. (just like you have garlic breath.) the breathalyzer doesn't exactly measure alcohol in your lungs, see the wiki.
"One of the ways our body gets rid of the alcohol we drink is through the lungs, in our breath." alcohol creates an acidotic state in the blood, and we blow off acid (CO2) via the lungs. we get rid of alcohol only via the liver. (maybe gut?)
"AWOL simply turns that procedure around and lets the alcohol enter the body through the lungs thus eliminating the dreaded hangover. " -- as long as alcohol enters your bloodstream there is potential for a hangover.
As much as I enjoy alcohol, this seems like a useless way of consuming alcohol. If you want to simply get drunk, this sounds like it takes forever (40min/shot!). I'm sure anyone can think of faster ways of getting drunk. If you want to taste the alcohol in a beer or spirit, I'm sure this would markedly diminish your enjoyment of the taste.
posted by ruwan at 10:19 PM on June 12, 2008