<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Are you hiding your valuables in your crotch?</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Are you hiding your valuables in your crotch?</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:04:08 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:04:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: Are you hiding your valuables in your crotch?</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch</link>	
  	<description>What are the &quot;pockets&quot; on the inside of women&apos;s panties for? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; In some of my panties (similar to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jockey.com/en-US/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?CS_ProductID=1200&amp;CS_Category=Underwear&amp;CS_Catalog=Women&amp;List=116&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt;) there is this pocket-like thing inside the crotch area that opens from the front (not like a fly on men&apos;s briefs which opens to the outside world; it only opens to the inside). It&apos;s like there is a dual layer of fabric in the crotch area that is not sewed down in the front. My best guess is that it&apos;s for a sanitary pad or a vibrator, but it seems too small for a pad, and odd that a major brand would sell something specifically for a vibrator. That seems like something you&apos;d buy at a sex shop. Hanes brand panties don&apos;t have these in my experience, and the cotton Jockeys mostly don&apos;t either. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jockey.com/en-US/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?CS_ProductID=1586&amp;CS_Category=Underwear&amp;CS_Catalog=Women&amp;List=122&quot;&gt;these definitely don&apos;t&lt;/a&gt;). If it&apos;s functional, why don&apos;t all panties have them? I feel horribly naive asking this, but not knowing is driving me crazy.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:56:49 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
	
	<category>panties</category>
	
	<category>underwear</category>
	
	<category>mysterypocket</category>
	
	<category>women</category>
	
	<category>lingerie</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: leesh</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373262</link>	
  	<description>I always assumed it was extra lining and wasn&apos;t sewed down in front b/c who wants a seam running across their lady parts?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373262</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:04:08 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>leesh</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Alison</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373263</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s not really a feature.  It&apos;s just an artifact of how they are constructed, sewing-wise.  If the open part of the pocket were sewn in then part of the lining would be visible on the outside of the panties.  I know this because I occasionally  sew my own underwear&lt;/font&gt;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373263</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:04:23 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: padraigin</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373265</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s just for absorbency I think, and I don&apos;t know why it&apos;s not sewed down in the front. A lot of panties have a double layer of fabric in the crotch that&apos;s sewn down all around, and in synthetic panties the extra layer is often cotton.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373265</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:05:26 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>padraigin</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: scody</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373266</link>	
  	<description>I think it&apos;s just a lining for the crotch (especially because they&apos;re almost invariably cotton, even if the rest of the panties are not); the fact that it&apos;s open on one end presumably makes for better airflow.  It all helps to keep the ladyparts happy.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373266</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:06:55 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>scody</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: All.star</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373275</link>	
  	<description>I *think* the extra fabric is just there to, uh, help keep things a bit dryer down there.  LOL.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373275</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:12:54 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>All.star</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jessamyn</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373276</link>	
  	<description>My feeling was that if you were making a zillion pairs of panties, the savings on thread for not sewing up the part in the front that didn&apos;t need sewing up would save you cash. Classier brands of panties are sewn through, I&apos;ve heard.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373276</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:13:15 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: limeonaire</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373280</link>	
  	<description>Yepdual lining means better absorbency, open means better airflow. And newer Hanes women&apos;s underwear does have this &amp;quot;feature&amp;quot;the super-cheap ones in plastic packages don&apos;t, but the slightly more expensive ones that come in open-to-the-air packs do.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373280</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:14:19 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>limeonaire</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: iamkimiam</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373281</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s just a breathable cotton layer to aid with ventilation and prevent bacteria growth, infection, or ruining of panties from moisture and/or discharge.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373281</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:15:34 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>iamkimiam</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: vytae</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373291</link>	
  	<description>I&apos;m sort of confused about some of these arguments.  It seems like panties are snug enough while being worn that there&apos;s not a lot of airflow happening between the two layers of fabric.  And if the top layer of the crotch area is &amp;quot;ruined&amp;quot; by whatever, I personally would throw the whole pair of panties away for being ruined rather than . . .  replacing that inner layer of fabric?  I don&apos;t even know.  I guess it could be an extra layer of absorbency to avoid ruining a pair of pants or skirt or something.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I had always assumed this was just a semi-cheating way of having cotton next to the important bits as recommended for health and hygiene, even when the outside of the underwear is made of something else.  It&apos;s just now occurring to me that I&apos;ve seen all-cotton underwear with the same feature.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373291</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:25:17 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>vytae</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: rokusan</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373331</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;Classier brands of panties are sewn through, I&apos;ve heard.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Indeed they are.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373331</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:46:50 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>rokusan</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Ambrosia Voyeur</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373359</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s called a gusset lining. I&apos;ve got some lace tangas that have a diamond-shaped one with no seams on the vertices at all. It bunches something crazy. The world of women&apos;s underthings is indeed a deep and abiding well of mysterious frippery. In googling around for gusset data, I found &lt;a href=&quot;http://reviews.ebay.com/Vintage-Panties-Characteristics-and-Why-So-Collectible_W0QQugidZ10000000002155255?ssPageName=BUYGD:CAT:-1:LISTINGS:4&quot;&gt;this interesting guide.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373359</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:05:38 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Ambrosia Voyeur</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Ambrosia Voyeur</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373363</link>	
  	<description>Okay, I know panties better than I know geometry. I meant &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; than on the vertices. So now you know.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373363</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:11:19 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Ambrosia Voyeur</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: MadamM</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373383</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s just a bit of extra fabric for the crotch area to keep things dryer. I imagine they don&apos;t sew down the front of the little pocket because the seam placement might be uncomfortable. It&apos;s always seemed kind of evident to me... how long have you been a girl, again? :P</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373383</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:34:04 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>MadamM</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: chowflap</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373514</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;I guess it could be an extra layer of absorbency to avoid ruining a pair of pants or skirt or something.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This is what I have always assumed it was for.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373514</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:12:22 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>chowflap</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: moonshine</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373525</link>	
  	<description>I always thought the cotton lining was for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.teenwire.com/ask/2003/as-20030307p523-thong.php?print=yes&quot;&gt;health reasons&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;[Oh good grief, I never thought I&apos;d link to teenwire, especially not from here]&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373525</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:19:26 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>moonshine</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Phalene</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373568</link>	
  	<description>Extra absorbancy. Also, vaginal secretions are caustic, and eventually burn holes through the first layer of fragile cotton.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373568</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:59:45 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Phalene</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: pmbuko</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373617</link>	
  	<description>I assumed it was a camel-toe preventative.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373617</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:32:49 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>pmbuko</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: eatdonuts</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/93906/Are-you-hiding-your-valuables-in-your-crotch#1373741</link>	
  	<description>agree with those who echo this. i have a friend who works in fashion but as a female it&apos;s just a given / more intuitive (or i thought so). mens and womens underwear is constructed differently with the extra panel on women&apos;s panties in the crotch as women &apos;need drainage&apos; (exact term used, although it makes me feel a bit icky as a woman to think it&apos;s referred this way). vaginas often produce a minimal amount of moisture at various intervals during the day, due to heat, excitement (not necessarily THAT kind), etc - not urine, just lubrication and this extra cotton panel absorbs it from the skin to prohibit collection and promote drying. it&apos;s supposed to be cotton to allow better ventilation but today that isn&apos;t always true.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.93906-1373741</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:20:51 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>eatdonuts</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
