<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Software or Websites Adopting IEC Standard Binary Prefixes?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/9372/Software-or-Websites-Adopting-IEC-Standard-Binary-Prefixes/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Software or Websites Adopting IEC Standard Binary Prefixes?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:02:31 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:02:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Software or Websites Adopting IEC Standard Binary Prefixes?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/9372/Software-or-Websites-Adopting-IEC-Standard-Binary-Prefixes</link>	
		<description>The latest version of ReverseConnect uses &lt;a href=&quot;http://members.optus.net/alexey/prefBin.xhtml&quot;&gt;IEC Standard Binary Prefixes&lt;/a&gt; (kibi-, mebi-, gibi-, etc.). Are there other examples of software, websites or other media that are adopting this less ambiguous usage?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.9372</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:57:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>signal</dc:creator>
		
			<category>reverseconnect</category>
		
			<category>software</category>
		
			<category>websites</category>
		
			<category>iec</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: shepd</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/9372/Software-or-Websites-Adopting-IEC-Standard-Binary-Prefixes#175656</link>	
		<description>I hate those &quot;standards&quot;.  KB means 1024.  Why redefine something that was working before just to suit Western Digital et al.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.9372-175656</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:02:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shepd</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cmonkey</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/9372/Software-or-Websites-Adopting-IEC-Standard-Binary-Prefixes#175660</link>	
		<description>Maybe I&apos;m just too oldschool, but that hardly seems &quot;less ambiguous&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.9372-175660</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:11:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonkey</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: signal</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/9372/Software-or-Websites-Adopting-IEC-Standard-Binary-Prefixes#175664</link>	
		<description>Read the first paragraph of the link, it explains why it&apos;s less ambiguous.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.9372-175664</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:18:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>signal</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cmonkey</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/9372/Software-or-Websites-Adopting-IEC-Standard-Binary-Prefixes#175668</link>	
		<description>Right, I get the technical distinction.  It just doesn&apos;t seem like it&apos;ll clear too much up in the mind of the general public.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.9372-175668</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:33:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonkey</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Mars Saxman</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/9372/Software-or-Websites-Adopting-IEC-Standard-Binary-Prefixes#175688</link>	
		<description>Oh ugh. Is there anyone, whose opinion actually matters, who is confused by the current usage? I mean, it&apos;s obvious by context: if you&apos;re talking about computers, you&apos;re talking about base 2. If you&apos;re talking about science or engineering, you&apos;re talking about base 10. And if you&apos;re not talking about computers, science, or engineering, you must be an English major or something, and you should leave conversations that involve numbers to the professionals.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Um, sorry, I guess I&apos;m not really answering the question. I&apos;ve never heard of anyone adopting the &quot;less ambiguous&quot; usage except to evangelize it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.9372-175688</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:28:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mars Saxman</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: signal</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/9372/Software-or-Websites-Adopting-IEC-Standard-Binary-Prefixes#175716</link>	
		<description>You&apos;re right, Mars. That doesn&apos;t answer my question.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.9372-175716</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:11:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>signal</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Kwantsar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/9372/Software-or-Websites-Adopting-IEC-Standard-Binary-Prefixes#175789</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are there other examples of software, websites or other media that are adopting this less ambiguous usage?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As a computerish-dude, I must say that your statement strikes me as not dissimilar to posting &quot;Are there any examples of campaigns, websites or other media that are promoting this flip-floppy john kerry?&quot; to the blue.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.9372-175789</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 01:30:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kwantsar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: seanyboy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/9372/Software-or-Websites-Adopting-IEC-Standard-Binary-Prefixes#175792</link>	
		<description>A webhosting provider that I use (dsvr) has been using this terminology for ages now. Confused the hell out of me the first time I saw it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.9372-175792</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:42:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seanyboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
