<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Physical handset for softphones?</title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/92160/Physical-handset-for-softphones/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Physical handset for softphones?</description>
	  	  <pubDate></pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: Physical handset for softphones?</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/92160/Physical-handset-for-softphones</link>	
  	<description>Handset that works with softphones?  As universal as possible. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I&apos;m starting to look at options for a business that wants to move to VOIP of one kind or another someday.  Which vendor, protocol, etc to go with is not even close to decided yet.  &lt;br&gt;
What has been decided:&lt;br&gt;
1) We don&apos;t want a VOIP system with complicated Cisco handsets or the like that require everyone to re-learn how to make a phone call.  We already have problems with most people refusing to learn how to do simple things like transfer a call using their existing PBX, so we&apos;re definitely not willing to have to learn seven new steps to make a phone call on a mini-computer masquerading as a phone.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2) Hearing that, I suggested softphones with headsets.  Reply to that was although there were a few people who were on the phone behind their desk all day and would happy to wear headsets, most users would want some kind of device that they could &quot;pick up and answer/dial&quot; instead of wearing a headset or fumbling to get one on every time the softphone rang.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So it seems I&apos;m now looking for either an adapter for their existing paid-for desk handsets (RJ11 at phone, USB at PC, mystery box in between?) that would control a softphone client - OR some kind of replacement handset that would act as a physical accessory for a softphone client.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve used a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000GKD150/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Philips VOIP 080&lt;/a&gt; myself, and liked it, but it fails in that it is Skype-specific and also too flimsy/lightweight to really be a replacement for a &quot;real&quot; phone.  But some kind of more universal USB phone peripheral should exist out  there somewhere.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My first research for this, and the fact that they are a pretty loyal MS shop makes me think that they may go with MS Unified Communications blah blah in the end, with the simplest &quot;Tanjay&quot; phone made.  But it seems that that product isn&apos;t quite done cooking yet;  I&apos;d also prefer that whatever USB phone peripheral not &quot;marry&quot; them to one particular software/client/VOIP protocol.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So does anyone know of a fairly universal USB &quot;phone&quot; peripheral?&lt;br&gt;
Or something that will connect a standard PBX-type phone in such a way that it could control a softphone, without specificying which softphone client is used?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.92160</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:56:38 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>bartleby</dc:creator>
	
	<category>softphone</category>
	
	<category>handset</category>
	
	<category>voip</category>
	
	<category>usb</category>
	
	<category>peripheral</category>
	
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
