Has there been any critical recognition of the similarity of the sculptures of Jachin and Boaz from Matthew Barney's
to important helical structures (the DNA helix and the alpha helix) from molecular biology?
I've been thinking about this for awhile, and I cannot find any commentary about it on Google, which is driving me crazy, because I cannot be the only person who has noticed it. Unfortunately, seeing this image is going to be tricky, because fucking artists just love fucking stupid flash.
Here's a link to the site for
Cremaster 3. Click on 'Characters' on the right. Now click on 'Hiram Abiff' towards the bottom on the left. That's the picture I'm interested in. Those two sculptures represent the pillars--Jachin and Boaz--that supported Solomon's temple, as crafted by Hiram Abiff. In Barney's representation each pillar is a helix. One has two distinct pitches, a minor grove and a major grove, the major grove about twice the width of the minor grove. The second has a single pitch, about half the width of the minor grove of the first. B-DNA (our canonical double helix) has two groves, the minor grove with a width of 12 Å and the major grove with a width of 22 Å. The alpha helix has a helical spacing of 5.4 Å.
I look at that image and I see the central dogma staring right back at me. Has anyone else noticed this? I can't find any relevant commentary.
Matthew Barney's Cremaster cycle (1994–2002) is self-enclosed aesthetic system consisting of five films that explore processes of creation.
Watson and Crick discovery of the double helix structure dates back to 1953.
Why would it be surprising that Barney use common knowledge in his work?
posted by bru at 8:20 AM on April 19, 2008