Did San Fran used to tax real property by door width?
April 11, 2008 6:41 AM   RSS feed for this thread Subscribe

I remember hearing that San Francisco property taxes used to be based on door width (obviously not anymore), can anyone confirm/deny this and/or provide any articles explaining it? Thanks.
posted by wangarific to law & government (8 comments total) 1 user marked this as a favorite
I think the taxes were probably more likely to be based on house width, like in Alexandria, VA, which has these extremely narrow homes - something like you find in the Sunset.
posted by parmanparman at 8:04 AM on April 11


In general, this seems really unlikely to me. Questions I would ask or things I would think about: used to when? If it's before 1906 you will probably not find any municipal records, since most were destroyed in the earthquake and fire. After 1906, SF did levy a single tax on land (http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/06.04.23.html), and that tax was based on land value in order to stimulate new building, but it had nothing to do with door width.

Here's an 1857 assessor's list

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/sf/list1857.htm

and a land title act from 1852

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/sf/gnl/sfdlnd.htm

You could try digging up the SF Chron article cited in the assessor's list but it's only going to be on microfilm.

(Yes, I am a historian, sometimes of San Francisco.)
posted by liketitanic at 8:06 AM on April 11


I remember someone telling me that houses used to have those beams sticking out the top so you could throw a rope over it and raise furniture up and into the windows because of the door, because the door was thin for tax reasons. That's why I thought SF used to tax RE by door width...
posted by wangarific at 8:13 AM on April 11


Well, it wouldn't be a very productive assessment, would it? A huge parcel of land with a narrow door would be assessed ridiculously low taxes.
posted by liketitanic at 8:20 AM on April 11


But you could also try calling the San Francisco History Center, or going down there. The staff is mostly great.

http://sfpl.lib.ca.us/librarylocations/sfhistory/sfhistory.htm
posted by liketitanic at 8:21 AM on April 11


This is an aside, but you might find it interesting based on your question. There is a part of the Netherlands called Baarle-Nassau that has a bunch of tiny Belgian exclaves in it. Some houses sit on both sides of the border, and taxes were based on where the front door was located. So as tax rules changed and it became advantage to be taxed in the other country, people would relocate their doors. More info here.
posted by Emanuel at 11:06 AM on April 11


The staff is mostly great.

Do tell!
posted by billtron at 1:43 PM on April 11


Not sure about San Francisco, but New Orleans had some odd ways of taxing homes in the 1800's. Most of the architecture in the older parts of the city were influenced by the tax assessors. Front yards were taxed, so the houses were built to the sidewalk (French Quarter).
Number of rooms, closets were counted as a room, no more closets. Number of floors, camel back homes were created. Width of house, narrow long houses called shot-guns that were one room wide.

Here is a blog that refers to some of the crazy ways to lessen one's tax bill in the latter centuries.
posted by JujuB at 6:23 PM on April 11


« Older Does anybody remember the cart...   |   What can I do on an idle Frida... Newer »

You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments



Related Questions
Lovecraftian Lawsuits Pt II August 26, 2008
Real Estate Attorney in Nashville? May 1, 2008
Do I risk it? March 16, 2008
Anyone know anything about "probate genealogy"? March 22, 2007
Landtrustfilter February 26, 2007