Comments on: Copyright issues in creating an ebook?

Question: Copyright issues in creating an ebook?

SampleSize — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:27:17 -0800

I'm thinking of creating an ebook that is a workbook companion for an existing popular investment book. What copyright issues do I have to consider? For example, can I title it "The [Investment Book Title] Workbook?" Can I do it at all without getting permission first?

By: that possible maker of pork sausages

that possible maker of pork sausages — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:53:40 -0800

I think that a workbook based upon an existing book would be considered a derivative work of the original book, and thus would be copyright infringement if you published it. I would think that you would need to track down the copyright holder and negotiate with them for permission to publish your workbook, or risk being sued afterwards.

By: onshi

onshi — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:05:31 -0800

IANAL, etc.... BUT, It all depends on the degree to which the specific content of the companion workbook draws on the content of the original book. A solid opinion on this can only come from a lawyer familliar with IP law in your jurisdiction who can review both works (or at least a robust outline of the proposed workbook, plus the original). Yes, there is a substantial risk of being sued -- but that risk won't necessarily scale accurately with the likely success of such a suit. That is, even a well-crafted work that stays within the bounds of what recent case law indicates is acceptable will probably attract legal threats regardless.

...The [Investment Book Title] Workbook...

My understanding is that although mere titles, in and of themselves, are not generally afforded copyright protection -- just think how many textbooks there are called Psychology, for example -- the contents of the work, however, are. Still, I would imagine the more the title might confuse your work with the original, the harder it will be to establish your work as non-derivative.

By: beagle

beagle — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:31:59 -0800

IANAL. But I like to pretend IAAL.

You're on pretty thin ice with this idea. Say somebody writes a difficult book, like Finnegan's Wake. You write a guide to that book and call it A Skeleton Key to Finnegan's Wake. (This has been done.) You don't need permission from the author of Finnegan's Wake. You are explaining the book. It's literary criticism and falls into the fair use provision of the Copyright Act. But. Now you want to create a workbook to allow buyers of your ebook to apply techniques promulgated in Investment Book Title. That's not "criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research," which are delineated in the Act as acceptable purposes for fair use. What you're really doing is extending the Investment Book Title product line. You're not interpreting it, commenting on it, etc. You're using the original concepts and providing templates to apply them, which are rights reserved to the original author.

So, agreeing with pork sausages above, you should propose partnering with the original author, who will want a cut of your profits. If you proceed on your own, whether or not the original author has a leg to stand on, you will probably be sued, which is not a Good Thing.

By: klangklangston

klangklangston — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:11:28 -0800

Generally, and IANAL either, this is a trademark issue, not a copyright issue: you can come up with problems that address the same topics as the original book in the same order without it being a derivative work, but you may still be open to litigation if it appears that this book will compete with the original or be reasonably confused as coming from the same folks who put out the primary source.

By: SampleSize

SampleSize — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:00:46 -0800

OK, sounds like not a great idea.

Thanks everyone.

By: cmgonzalez

cmgonzalez — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:09:59 -0800

I've seen books meant to accompany other books that have been titled "The Unauthorized Companion to [X]", often with a disclaimer on the front in smaller print.

IANAL, but the obvious "unauthorized" nature of it might free you.

By: DarlingBri

DarlingBri — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:31:31 -0800

According to the doctrine of Nominative Use, then I think you can indeed use the other book's name in the title:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominative_use