<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Tell me about running a torrent tracker.</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8690/Tell-me-about-running-a-torrent-tracker/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Tell me about running a torrent tracker.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:58:48 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:58:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Tell me about running a torrent tracker.</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8690/Tell-me-about-running-a-torrent-tracker</link>	
		<description>A few questions  for anyone who has set up/administered a torrent tracker: Is running a tracker gonna take lots of bandwidth and/or server cpu cycles? Are some trackers more efficient in these respects than others? Whats the best open-source PHP tracker? Answers and any other caveats much appreciated.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8690</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:26:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fupped Duck</dc:creator>
		
			<category>bittorrent</category>
		
			<category>torrent</category>
		
			<category>admin</category>
		
			<category>trackers</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: dorian</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8690/Tell-me-about-running-a-torrent-tracker#166177</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Is running a tracker gonna take lots of bandwidth and/or server cpu cycles?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
not really, but depends on how fancy it is, and how much torrents/users you will have. if you plan to do the seeding yourself, that will also be a consideration.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
basically the bandwidth and cpu cycles will come much more from the tracker website than the tracker itself, which is minimal.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Are some trackers more efficient in these respects than others?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
the less complex it is, generally the more efficient it is. I use the plain-vanilla tracker that comes with bittornado, and allow the torrent files to be downloadable from its autogenerated web page -- the most basic operation, but it works and even the web portion takes up little cpu.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
if you do plan to seed, check out something that has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://bittornado.com/docs/superseed.txt&quot;&gt;super-seed&lt;/a&gt; mode (again e.g. bittornado) -- this will let you seed with much less impact on prcs bndwdth, and, by the same token, cpu.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
haven&apos;t bothered with any of the php ones, sorry.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8690-166177</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:58:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dorian</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: waxpancake</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8690/Tell-me-about-running-a-torrent-tracker#166178</link>	
		<description>I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://dehacked.2y.net:6969/&quot;&gt;PHPBTTracker&lt;/a&gt; for my &lt;a href=&quot;http://waxy.org/bt/&quot;&gt;tracker&lt;/a&gt;.  If you don&apos;t seed files locally, it doesn&apos;t take much bandwidth at all... Mostly, it&apos;s just MySQL calls.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8690-166178</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:11:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>waxpancake</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
