<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Danger! Water contains high levels of hydrogen.</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Danger! Water contains high levels of hydrogen.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:12:50 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:12:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Danger! Water contains high levels of hydrogen.</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen</link>	
		<description>WTF is up with &lt;a href=&quot;http://clients.mcabledesign.com/Watersign.jpg&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; sign? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Background: I live in Louisville, Kentucky. Today I was downtown at the big park on the riverfront shooting reference for a project, and I saw &lt;a href=&quot;http://clients.mcabledesign.com/Watersign.jpg&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; sign beside of a fountain. Now, since there are two atoms of Hydrogen in each molecule of water already, what&apos;s up with this? Is the city parks department pranking us? Is there a legitimate situation in which flowing water at an outside fountain would somehow be infused with extra hydrogen? Discuss.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:10:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mcable</dc:creator>
		
			<category>water</category>
		
			<category>chemistry</category>
		
			<category>fountains</category>
		
			<category>Louisville</category>
		
			<category>Kentucky</category>
		
			<category>hydrogen</category>
		
			<category>signs</category>
		
			<category>Riverfront</category>
		
			<category>Park</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Mach5</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258060</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://molinedemocraticmaverick.blogspot.com/2006/11/this-water-contains-high-levels-of.html&quot;&gt;Its gotta be a joke.&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,204279,00.html&quot;&gt;Yep, it is.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258060</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:12:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mach5</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: JJ86</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258063</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_water&quot;&gt;H30=deuterium oxide causes sterility and death in due time.&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;d probably avoid it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258063</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:14:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JJ86</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Mcable</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258068</link>	
		<description>Mach5: way to go, you nailed it in record time. I assumed it had to be a joke, but I&apos;m deeply impressed someone at the Waterfront development corporation has that much of a sense of humor.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
OK, we can all go home now.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258068</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:23:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mcable</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: tinkertown</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258078</link>	
		<description>Is there some possibility that current is being passed through the water supply line for some reason, e.g. electrolysis?  That would cause it to be infused with hydrogen gas.  On the other hand, the warning signs would be more serious and I&apos;m sure there&apos;d be &quot;no smoking&quot; placards.  More confusing than funny, I guess.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258078</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:37:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tinkertown</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rancidchickn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258086</link>	
		<description>[i]H30=deuterium oxide causes sterility and death in due time. I&apos;d probably avoid it.[/i]&lt;br&gt;
Deuterium oxide still has the formula H2O. The hydrogen is just radioactive (has 1 extra neutron).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258086</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:44:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rancidchickn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: grouse</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258092</link>	
		<description>Deuterium is not radioactive. Tritium is, however.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258092</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:52:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grouse</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: blue_beetle</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258104</link>	
		<description>Any chance someone is venting hydrogen gas into the water?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258104</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:07:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Class Goat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258136</link>	
		<description>I think this is the chemistry equivalent of the &quot;Danger! 10,000 Ohms!&quot; sign</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258136</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:38:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Class Goat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ikkyu2</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258399</link>	
		<description>Deuterium oxide is toxic, though.  It&apos;s not H3O - H&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; is hydronium ion, which is formed in acid solution - it&apos;s usually written D&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258399</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:48:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ikkyu2</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ctmf</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258400</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t think it&apos;s a very good joke.  Reason: even though I know full well the chemical makeup of water, I also know quite a few situations (some of which mentioned above) that might cause said water to present a risk of hydrogen &lt;em&gt;gas&lt;/em&gt; evolution.  Which could be dangerous.  Unless I knew otherwise, I might take that sign at face value or at least have to wonder if it was serious or not, and I resent the implication that that makes me dumb.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Rather, I think it points out that the smug &quot;joker&quot; doesn&apos;t really know very much chemistry, other than the chemical symbol for water.  Wee ha.  Golf clap.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258400</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:48:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ctmf</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: hattifattener</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258402</link>	
		<description>rancidchicken: Deuterium is often represented with a D (e.g., D&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O) though there&apos;s a perfectly good symbol for it already, &lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;H. (That&apos;s a superscript, in case mefi strips it the sup tag.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258402</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:51:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hattifattener</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ctmf</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1258411</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m trying to say, about as funny as posting the beach as a radiation area.  Cosmic rays, you know.  Ha ha.  Only how am I supposed to know that there isn&apos;t also a real radiation hazard there for some (very far-fetched) reason?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1258411</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:55:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ctmf</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mdn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1259004</link>	
		<description>what ctmf said.  it says &quot;high levels&quot; of hydrogen - H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; is &lt;i&gt;ordinary&lt;/i&gt; levels of hydrogen.  The implication is that there is somehow extra hydrogen, which could be dangerous, as chemistry is very much about the ratios of things (O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; is good to breathe, O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; is not, e.g.).  If he&apos;d said &quot;Warning: contains Hydrogen&quot; he could have claimed his joke, but he&apos;d have had to accept the fact that pretty freakin much everybody understands that water is H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1259004</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:53:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mdn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ostranenie</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/85108/Danger-Water-contains-high-levels-of-hydrogen#1261045</link>	
		<description>The FOX News article said the guy who had the signs made wanted to scare people off from splashing around in the fountains? And he thought their ignorance of chemistry (like, third-grade chemistry) would scare them off? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
How about a &quot;NO SPLASHING - POTENTIALLY DEADLY BACTERIA&quot; sign? That&apos;s about the same level of funny and probably a lot more effective. And, it might resolve liability issues for bonus points (I doubt Mr. Waterfront genuinely cares much about the well-being of the splashers if he&apos;s joking about tasing them).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.85108-1261045</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:01:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ostranenie</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
