<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: What methods do sites use to prevent the downloading of images?  Are there ways around the methods?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post What methods do sites use to prevent the downloading of images?  Are there ways around the methods?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:18:22 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:18:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: What methods do sites use to prevent the downloading of images?  Are there ways around the methods?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods</link>	
		<description>Sometimes I&apos;ll be at a website that won&apos;t allow me to click and download an image. How do you code this? Is it basic html? ...Also, does this really protect the image from being downloaded or are there ways around it? (beyond doing a screenshot) Is embedding the image in a flash document a good idea too? - thanks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:12:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter H</dc:creator>
		
			<category>image</category>
		
			<category>web</category>
		
			<category>protection</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: grumblebee</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163744</link>	
		<description>Here&apos;s the code: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ourhutch.com/examples/rightclick.html&quot;&gt;http://www.ourhutch.com/examples/rightclick.html&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It&apos;s really easy to circumvent in all sorts of ways. There&apos;s even a &lt;a href=&quot;http://update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=89&amp;vid=101&amp;category=&quot;&gt;firefox plugin&lt;/a&gt; that circumvents it for you.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163744</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:18:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grumblebee</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: grumblebee</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163746</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s pretty easy to pull an image out of a Flash document. There are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=swf+decompile&quot;&gt;a zillion free tools&lt;/a&gt; that will hack into a swf and pull anything out of it: mp3s, sounds, fonts, jpegs...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163746</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:22:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grumblebee</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Peter H</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163749</link>	
		<description>Thanks for the links! Very cool to learn about - best, Peter.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(on preview - great thanks for the zillion free tools, as well)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163749</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:25:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter H</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: gramcracker</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163751</link>	
		<description>You can always do a screenshot too.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163751</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:32:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gramcracker</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rhapsodie</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163752</link>	
		<description>Tons of ways around it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163752</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:34:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhapsodie</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ChasFile</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163755</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;does this really protect the image from being downloaded&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you are viewing the image then you have already downloaded it.  Disallowing right-click merely removes one of the simplest means of permanently saving it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163755</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:40:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChasFile</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: zeoslap</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163766</link>	
		<description>Completely useless, image is already in your cache.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163766</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 11:14:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zeoslap</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: DBAPaul</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163786</link>	
		<description>Right click (Hold down), press the space bar to dismiss the dialog box, release right click your menu should appear allowing you to save the image.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Having said that, I agree with zeoslap.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163786</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 11:46:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DBAPaul</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: dogwelder</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163805</link>	
		<description>You don&apos;t even need a special plugin for IE- hover over the image for a bit, and a toolbar with a save option will appear in the upper left corner.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163805</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 12:25:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dogwelder</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: grumblebee</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163807</link>	
		<description>Well, I HATE that script. It&apos;s really annoying, but I disagree that it&apos;s completely useless. If you want to protect your images against &quot;the average joe,&quot; it works pretty well. Joe doesn&apos;t know about things like caches. So he&apos;ll probably just move on, rather than try to save your images. On the other hand, average Mefi types will probably get so pissed off that they will be MORE likely to steal your images, alter them in photoshop (maybe mixing them with pornographic photos) and post them all over the web.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163807</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 12:27:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grumblebee</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: quonsar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163813</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Completely useless, image is already in your cache.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
this bears repeating: if you are looking at it, it&apos;s already been downloaded.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163813</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 12:43:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quonsar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Kwantsar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163819</link>	
		<description>The anti-right click scripts typically entirely disable the use of the right mouse button.  On most windows based browsers, that prevents you from right clicking and selecting &quot;back&quot; from the menu.  Highly frustrating.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163819</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 12:54:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kwantsar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: gimonca</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163821</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ll briefly mention the LWP modules in perl--one could use them to write a tiny script to suck out all those non-right-clickable images from an entire site in one swoop. That&apos;d show &apos;em.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163821</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:00:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gimonca</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: seanyboy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163824</link>	
		<description>That overlay&apos;s pretty snazzy though. &lt;br&gt;
I wonder if there was a way of sucking a random sample of the picture into a transparent overlay which could be placed over the original picture (sans the random sample). That way, the picture would look right on the screen, but would actually consist of two different images.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Or... could the image be streamed as a movie (thus removing it from the screen-print buffer) consisting of the same frame repeated a couple of times.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163824</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:15:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seanyboy</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: holloway</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163939</link>	
		<description>seanyboy: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/gallery/mptv/1228/Mptv/1228/2405_0002.jpg?path=pgallery&amp;path_key=Gordon,%20Ruth%20(I)&quot;&gt;imdb do this for their images&lt;/a&gt; (a cell with the background image of the photo, with a transparent gif over the top).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
VLC/MPlayer/Quicktime/MS Media Player/Realplayer can all disable hardware accelerated rendering so people could take a screenshot.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
ps. Hi Peter H!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163939</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 18:56:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holloway</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: holloway</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163946</link>	
		<description>(hmm.. nevermind, I think you&apos;re a different Peter Harrison -- not the NZOSS guy)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163946</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 19:52:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holloway</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: salmacis</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#163999</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;imdb do this for their images&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Interesting...and very cunning. How do you get round this then? (Or at least..what&apos;s the easiest way?)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-163999</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 03:34:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>salmacis</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: holloway</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/8501/What-methods-do-sites-use-to-prevent-the-downloading-of-images-Are-there-ways-around-the-methods#164303</link>	
		<description>View the source, find the reference to background=&quot;...&quot; and load that image.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2004:site.8501-164303</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 01:43:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holloway</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
